• afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    The Washington Post has advocated for a direct US military invasion of Syria multiple times and yet that didn’t impact morale apparently

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Why would a guest editorial affect morale? Why was the defeat of ISIS a bad thing? You do realize that the Syrian dictator was the cause of a massive war in Syria, not the USA right? You do realize that Putin sent massive military forces into Syria to keep their naval base right and prop up the dictator right?

      Turkey is the country that should have “invaded” Syria, not the USA. They are right on the border and Syria was part of their country less than 100 years earlier. They could have went in and established safe zones for the refuges fleeing the dictator and kicked out ISIS.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It wasn’t A GUEST editorial. It was multiple, plural and it was from the editorial board not a guest. Also this is before ISIS. Also they were on the side of the so-called moderates against Asaad.

        Yes I am aware that Asaad is a bad person. Just because the dictator is a bad person doesn’t mean people opposing them are our friends and it also doesn’t mean the US should commit troops. We are not the police department for planet Earth nor should we ever ever be.

        Yes I am aware Putin was/is on the side of the Syrian government. Again, that is not a justification (by the treaties the US signed) for an US troop ground invasion.

        The Washington Post pushed for the US to illegally invade a country we had no business being in. They pushed for it repeatedly. As I mentioned to my emails to them on the subject, if they want to fight there they should fly over and do it themselves. I am sure their best buddies the “moderates” would love the help.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh that’s horrible. During the Arab spring, when Assad was literally levelling Aleppo killing his own population and destroying cultural heritage to booth, some people wanted the US to intervene. How could one ever again work with such inhumane colleagues? /s

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes very terrible. I wont downplay it.

            Now, did the US sign a legally binding document in 1945 that forbid wars of aggression without UN authorization, yes or no?

            Watch as this question gets ignored.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Really every warmonger can be defeated by the Socratic method. Which is why they constantly avoid it. Declare that a problem exists, declare that violence is the only way whatsoever to get rid of the problem, and then fuck off to hang out with their military contractor buddies.

                The Iraq war could have been stopped with Congress just asking some basic questions, you know if they wanted to.