• kier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is.

        Do it in humans.

        Humans can understand the risks involved. Other animals cannot.

        If we’re going to fuck something up, it better be on our own species.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          And if you look long enough in the right places, you can also pay them peanuts… or for them 😒

        • Bandananaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          A new treatment is developed for a condition that affects babies. Are you volunteering your child for testing?

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yea stopping animal testing sounds great, but animal testing is the backbone of drug and medical breakthroughs. So at least for now that’s not possible

      • Siv@lemmy.praxis.red
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Recognition that animal testing is actually pretty fucked up would be a good start toward funding research into alternatives, such as biological computer simulations.

        We can simulate complex/chaotic systems, like weather, in nearly real-time, so biosim research is mainly a funding and staffing problem at this point.

        Probably we’ll still need animal testing for the final phase before human trials, but we can at least reduce the need for it to bare minimums.

    • eltimablo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Cool, where should we test all the pet food and medical treatments for animals then?