• LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    That’s probably the number that includes people that don’t work though… all the income numbers would shift down in that case

    • Aquila@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      That’s generally excluded and even if it’s not unemployment has been very low recently

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        The problem with the unemployment statistic is that it doesn’t include most people we would consider unemployed. If a person hasn’t actively been job searching in the past four weeks, they are not counted. Therefore it does not count prisoners, full-time students, retirees, most of the homeless, etc.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yeah I’m seeing 40k but a bunch of other numbers as well, some above 50k. It really comes down to how you measure it but in any case the numbers in the meme don’t make sense.

        BTW though unemployment is not the same as number of people not working. It refers just to people actively looking for a job that aren’t employed.

        • Aquila@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I think it’s just hyperbole. The median numbers are accurate enough even if meme was made 5 years ago

          • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            But none of the numbers in the meme are medians… they’re all averages. If they were all medians they wouldn’t change at all.