• Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No, I’m disagreeing. You could study anything you wanted, not what the state wanted. It was just hard to get a slot.

    I guess it’s similar to how it’s incredibly hard to get a scholarship at a great university today. You’d hardly say that the modern scholarship system “forces you to study what the state wants”.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not as different as recent past in Brazil. Federal and State universities where free and the top of the country, but the slots were few and the competition high. And because class disparities were reinforced on school education, even if the universities were free, only rich and middle income families were able to get in. Since the first Lula’s government, there have been policies in place to ensure that public schools and black students have exclusive slots. Brazillian middle class hate it, but they can eat it. This year was the first time in history that USP (best university in Brazil) had more admission from public schools that for private ones.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, that does sound very comparable to what I was talking about. Your example and mine both do not have the state deciding what university you apply to though, which is what I understood from “the state decides what you’ll study”.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The university you apply for has nothing to do with what you’ll study if admissions are politically motivated.