• k110111@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Firstly, i am happy and appreciate that you feel for the families of the victim.

    No? Just because some people believe it doesn’t make it true.

    Im not saying it is makes it true. But because of my belief (and the belief of the people who died and go for hajj), it is truth for me.

    In the end I am responsible for my actions, and my time here on earth.

    The butterfly effect is well proven and very easy to see with simply a double pendulum.

    Butterfly effect and double pendulum are both examples of chaotic systems. We cannot predict their motion because the tiniest changes lead to huge changes later on.

    What I am saying is that, we humans can not predict what will happen because of the butterfly effect but since Allah is not bound by the laws of the universe (ie. He is infinite). Therefore the judgment that an action he took is wrong or right is not something we can know.

    Or to never exercise it at all clearly. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t exist?

    That’s just your opinion and i obviously disagree.

    Very convenient way of explaining away the fact that good things and bad things happen randomly and/or as a direct result of human actions, not as a result of “Allah” choosing how to “exercise love”.

    Again the difference between your statement and my statement is that my statements come from my belief in Allah and yours from your disbelief in Allah.

    How do you know that? There is zero real proof and any “proof” in Islam has been well and truly debunked. You can’t just take an old book at it’s word you know.

    My belief in Allah and thereafter is based on my personal experiences. And unless you experience it as well I doubt that you will become a believer because of my experiences. I do pray that you experience it as well but that’s about all that I can do.

    What is “this ability” you’re talking about?

    The ability to know both future and past. He is all knowing. In islamic theology, Allah exist outside of the universe and not bound by its rules. Everything else has to follow some rules/laws, he is the creator and everything else is created.

    And Allah doesn’t exist, sorry to break it to you.

    Again, we disagree because of our belief systems.

    • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The difference is I disbelieve because I’ve read portions of the Quran and found logical faults/inconsistencies which can’t be made by an omnipotent being and you believe because… ??

      • k110111@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I believe because of my personal experiences. You cannot know what could or couldn’t be said by an omnipotent being unless you are omnipotent as well, especially when the Quran is not a book of proofs and mathematics.

        • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I’m sorry but when the Quran makes it out that the sun and moon both orbit Earth when that is very clearly false I can’t take it seriously.

          Copying from a comment I made on Reddit:

          The Quran is considered the unchanging word of Allah passed down to Muhammed by Gabriel. But then what does it mean when the Quran is demonstrably wrong? Well, it means Islam falls apart as the “word of Allah” is disproven.

          For example, I’m going to note a verse from the Quran which reveals the Quran’s model of the solar system:

          “It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day. They float each in an orbit.” (Quran 36:40)

          I’ve picked this verse because typically when the Quran conflicts with well-known, proven, modern fact and science, the defense from Muslims is that it’s metaphorical in some way (how convenient). But here not even the metaphorical interpretation makes sense, so its a good verse to solidly disprove.

          First, the literal interpretation:

          The idea of “overtaking” and the sun and moon’s inability to do so requires the two objects (in this case, the sun and moon) to be moving along roughly the same path/direction (or in the case of celestial objects, the same orbit), else the sentence makes no sense. Following this, this means that according to the Quran, the sun and moon follow the same orbit, an orbit around Earth (i.e. an Earth-centred solar system). This isn’t true, and is easily proven nowadays.

          The metaphorical interpretation:

          If we take “overtaking” to mean appearing to cross over in the sky and not literal overtaking, well, that’s still wrong. Because exactly that happens during a solar eclipse. The moon appears to overtake the sun in the sky, crossing over it and eclipsing it in the process. So the metaphorical interpretation is also incorrect.

          As we can see, no matter which way we decide to interpret this verse, literal or metaphorical, it’s wrong. The “word of Allah” is wrong, and Islam crumbles.