We believe that any software should support fundamental digital freedoms. With the rise of cryptography and computer systems, it is now possible to guarantee these freedoms in the world of bits: privacy of thoughts, freedom of speech, right to authorship, and autonomy from software providers. These rights can be encoded into the code, which when open, can be freely verified by anyone. This way, trust among users and developers can be established.

This is our way. By opening our source code, we ensure that our users have complete autonomy and independence from the Any Association. They retain the ability to analyze, compile, and run each software component on their personal machines without relying on external parties. This guarantees uninterrupted access to the tools and data they generate and store, shielding them from any potential restrictions.

We see our products as an open ecosystem where the community can contribute in various ways, not only by committing to the core source code. Contributors can develop integrations, design themes, create use cases for the in-app library, or provide documentation and translations.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see. I would like to see a FOSS alternative to Obsidian but its ecosystem with plugins and such is way too useful for me as a writer, roleplayer and gamemaster that I really can’t replace it with anything else. But Anytype isn’t it then. Thanks for the comparision.

    • tsuni@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why wouldn’t you consider Obsidian FOSS? It seems like the source code is available. I’m relatively new to open source and not trying to argue, just think that there’s a distinction that I’m missing.

      • macniel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just because they have github repos for their releases and community plugins and their spec doesn’t mean they are Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).

        • Free would apply, since you can use it with free of charge, and you don’t even need their Sync service since you can host it on your own git repository.
        • Open Source, no there where it fails down. Their source isn’t open, as it isn’t publically available.
        • tsuni@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, I don’t know why I thought they were open source when the second line of the releases github says they aren’t, lol. Thank you for clearing that up for me!

      • Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        FOSS software is developed in such a way that you can build it yourself freely (In other words, you can download the source code and compile the actual application yourself, free of charge). Obsidian doesn’t really work that way. Even if most of the code is available, the full app is only available as prepackaged binaries which might introduce god knows what (and make forking the application impossible).

        • uberrice@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At that point, it’s not FOSS, just OSS. Free means that it also uses a license that is ‘Free’ - as RMS would put it ‘libre’. So -, you can - under stipulations, do whatever you want with the Source code.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s actually Trilium, with one L.

        Never heard of it before and wanted to take a look, very difficult to find it with two Ls, as that’s the name of some large corporate software platform thing (and a flower) 😅

        Does Trilium have community plugins like Obsidian? I’ve fallen head over heels for Obsidian quite recently, and the plugins are a large part of it.

      • tsuni@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used it for years before moving to Obsidian, Trillium’s great. I’m thinking of going back, the web app was a really nice feature that I’m surprised is still missing in Obsidian.

      • J.B. Pinkle@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m more than a year into using a Trilium instance at home and another at work for taking notes and keeping track of various information.

        I love it love it love it, maybe especially at work, but I am certain I use only a tiny fraction of its capabilities.

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Logseq takes a very different approach with regards to the minimum working object, opting for something closer to paragraphs than pages, but it’s currently my go to recommendation along with Trillium. It also has great stylus/handwritten support.

    • density@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the only one that compares to obsidian is joplin.

      Reluctant obsidian user here. One of the only non floss tools i use.