the english language wikipedia article is full of totally-not-biased moderators who insist on using “Chinese Communist Party” and revert it from “Communist Party of China” every time, even when users point out that every single national-level communist party on the face of the planet uses the standardization “communist party of [nation]” and not even CPUSA is an exception to that rule. The reason they do it is plain and simple: They need to link up the biased fascist red scare /yellow scare propaganda campaign of the imperial core bourgeoisie with the totally neutral wiki article.
those two options aren’t mutually exclusive, and also a “wikipedia op” isn’t a thing in and of itself, there’s usually some kind of political motivation behind it. And the PRC is governed by a Communist party just like USSR (CCCP) was. So I don’t really see the need to “link” the two when they’re already linked by Communism.
the english language wikipedia article is full of totally-not-biased moderators who insist on using “Chinese Communist Party” and revert it from “Communist Party of China” every time, even when users point out that every single national-level communist party on the face of the planet uses the standardization “communist party of [nation]” and not even CPUSA is an exception to that rule. The reason they do it is plain and simple: They need to link up the biased fascist red scare /yellow scare propaganda campaign of the imperial core bourgeoisie with the totally neutral wiki article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chinese_Communist_Party#Regarding_CPC_vs_CCP
I think it’s an op to associate it with CCCP, and not a wikipedia op.
those two options aren’t mutually exclusive, and also a “wikipedia op” isn’t a thing in and of itself, there’s usually some kind of political motivation behind it. And the PRC is governed by a Communist party just like USSR (CCCP) was. So I don’t really see the need to “link” the two when they’re already linked by Communism.