• No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not sure Rick when one can insure a hole in one is just a business decision.

      But I get it health housing and catastrophic losses could be better monitored and regulated.

    • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d qualify that as for-profit mandatory insurance.

      Canpt get a mortgage without home insurance. Canpt drive a vehicle without at least liability. Those rates should be strictly government regulated to be sustainable and non-profit.

      But if you want to insure your collection if priceless Whitworth wrenches, well maybe I care a bit (Just a bit!) less about insurance gouging.