Meldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 3 months agoUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1733arrow-down124
arrow-up1709arrow-down1external-linkUsing stock photos as intended? LMFAOOOlemmy.wtfMeldrik@lemmy.wtfM to Facepalm@lemmy.wtf · 3 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squaredrunkpostdisaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down6·3 months agoTo be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up34arrow-down2·3 months agoFor the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·3 months agoNo. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
minus-squareMacStache@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·3 months agoGood news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!
To be fair I would have expected a tiny bit more effort.
For the poster? Nah. They’re right, that’s what stock photos are for. What, you want them to whip up a unique CGI model for no discernable improvement in quality in a still picture?
No. I want them to photograph real sharks. No CGI.
Good news! Someone already did and is selling that photo in stock photo services!