• vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honest question: why did we accept the nickname Holodomor? Why don’t we have catchy nicknames for the actually genocidal famines that the British did in their colonies? Why is it the “Belgian Congo atrocities” and not, idk, the “belgienocide” or the “capitalist turbo hand-cutter 3000”?

    • 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We don’t and shouldn’t. Accepting that name is literally Holocaust denial because that was its purpose — to minimize genocide by making a fictional one so that they can call us genocide deniers instead of them.

      I’m surprised they didn’t have Yeonmi Park make up some catchier name for the Arduous March to be honest…