David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 month agoChatGPT makes a terrible doctor. But it’s very convincing!pivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down10
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkChatGPT makes a terrible doctor. But it’s very convincing!pivot-to-ai.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squaremaol@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-21 month agoChatGPT: not just useless, but worse than useless.
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down10·1 month agoIt’s occasionally really useful at knocking out some Regex or other code. But only if you’re already an expert so you can check the result.
minus-squareskillissuer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoso it is useless because doing it yourself doesn’t burn square km of rainforest per line of code
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoYeah. Judging by the down votes I’m guessing people have misunderstood my comment and think I’m complementing ChatGPt… 🤣
ChatGPT: not just useless, but worse than useless.
It’s occasionally really useful at knocking out some Regex or other code. But only if you’re already an expert so you can check the result.
so it is useless because doing it yourself doesn’t burn square km of rainforest per line of code
Yeah. Judging by the down votes I’m guessing people have misunderstood my comment and think I’m complementing ChatGPt… 🤣