65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ranked choice still doesn’t solve the winner-takes-all situation that is the presidential election. Instead it should be appointed by a group of competent people, who in turn are voted in by something like ranked choice or whatever.

    • TunaLobster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      The original intent from the Constitution was that the winner was president and the second place was vice president. Since the vice president also is the tie breaking vote in the Senate, that doesn’t sit very well with the president. So they changed it to the running mate system.

      The group your talking about would essentially be the cabinet? Right? They get approved by Congress. So indirect approval by the people.

      • nxfsi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The cabinet doesn’t appoint the president, so no. More like Congress members members get voted in by ranked choice, and they vote on someone to represent the country in international affairs.