• AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    https://manoa.hawaii.edu/koreanstudies/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/DPRK-Constitution-2019-EN.pdf

    Article 6.

    The organs of State power at all levels, from the county People’s Assembly to the Supreme People’s Assembly, are elected on the principle of universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret ballot.

    There’s no excuse for you not being able or willing to find this yourself and yet being more than willing to spout off as you have.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The organs of State power at all levels, from the county People’s Assembly to the Supreme People’s Assembly, are elected on the principle of universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret ballot

      It seems it is the secret ballot one that is conflict with the earlier quote. Do we know if they follow that principle, that their elections are what they say?

      There’s no excuse for you not being able or willing to find this yourself and yet being more than willing to spout off as you have.

      Laziness, really.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It seems it is the secret ballot one that is conflict with the earlier quote. Do we know if they follow that principle, that their elections are what they say?

        You can’t beg the question like this and blame it on laziness. You’re a deliberate bad faith actor.

        Who can we believe? The constitution that defines how that government works or a completely unattributed claim?

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean the US constitution has lots of fancy stuff in it that I’m not sure I take to be so in reality. So I’d definitely prefer if we had some sort of confirmation.

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            Português
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            So if we don’t have confirmation is not true? But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?

            Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              So if we don’t have confirmation is not true?

              No, it’s just unconfirmed

              But the article on wikipedia without confirmation must be true because is on the internet?

              The constitution was online too though.

              Why you doubt only what is not constructed in your mind?

              I don’t know what you mean, could you rephrase this one?

              • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                Português
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The constitution was online too though.

                Published by an american university.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I just meant that if I was believing/disbelieving stuff just because it was online then I would’ve treated them the same, since both were online