Seems this will be always the case. Small objects are harder to detect than larger objects. Higher contrast objects are easier to detect than lower contrast objects. Even if detection gets 1000x better, these cases will still be true. Do you introduce artificial error to make things fair?
Repeating the same comment from a crosspost.
Seems this will be always the case. Small objects are harder to detect than larger objects. Higher contrast objects are easier to detect than lower contrast objects. Even if detection gets 1000x better, these cases will still be true. Do you introduce artificial error to make things fair?
Wouldn’t calling someone a boot licker be ad hominem? Not arguing against the boot licker comment but it seem seems hypocritical to claim ad hominem to defend an ad hominem.
I was thinking Patrick Swayze from Red Dawn since they said “a” wolverine not “the”. Thought I could pick.
NIF is used to test nuclear weapon stock piles without actually detonating them as a test. This is in compliance with the START treaties
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111shrg65071/html/CHRG-111shrg65071.htm You can search “ignition” for the couple references.
Feels like the Digg transition.
Boost for Lemmy is coming.
I always felt Wilson in the movie “Castaway” was the most realistic portrayal of God for survival situations.