Is it OK to simply dd the 128GB disk to the 32GB disk using count to stop after the 16GB partition was cloned?

I think it would work, but it seems a little overcomplicated, you can just use the partition paths as if and of of dd directly, as long as the output partition is not smaller than the input partition. For example dd if=/dev/sdc1 of=/dev/sdd1 bs=4M status=progress

Your method would also copy the partition table I suppose, which might be something you want under specific circumstances, but then it would be a little harder to get the count right, just taking the size of partition 1 would be wrong, because there is some space before it (where the partition table lives) and dd would start at 0. You’d need to add up the start position and the size of partition 1 instead.

Personally I would prefer making a new partition table on the new eMCC, and create a target partition on it. Then you clone the content of the partition (i.e. the file system). This way the file system UUID will still be the same, and the fstab should still work because these days it usually refers to mounts by filesystem UUID in my experience.

If you make the target partition larger than the source partition, and you intend to use the full partition going forward you will additionally need to resize the filesystem to fit the new larger partition, for example with resize2fs.

Sure, and the promo was 14.98 first and was then changed to 14.88 after 12 days by accident? All just happenstance?

I won’t detail everything again here, please let me refer you to my comment from when the story broke:

https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/22420855/13240839

In laptops the internal screen is usually attached over embedded Displayport (eDP) could be the same here. “native” doesn’t really say much.

To which I said something like ‘But all that does is highlight the problem without actually changing the situation.’

I think the idea is, that the minimally invasive regulation only has to fix the information imbalance between producer and consumer. Then, once the consumer has all the information, they can make an informed racional market actor descision. That’s supposed to price shitty rip offs out of the market eventually.

… yeah I don’t believe it works either.

[Der Landesbauernverband in Baden-Württemberg] teilte dem SWR auf Anfrage mit, der Fall aus Kupferzell sei “der erste und bisher einzige, von dem wir in diesem Jahr gehört haben.” Glücklicherweise handele es sich nur um seltene Einzelfälle - und über die Motive, warum jemand so etwas mache, könne man nur spekulieren.

Dann ist das Problem also klein? Seltsamer Titel.

Because we humans are very bad at putting in an accurate search such as: name:“60w” and description:“standby”.

I actually really like to do that. These days that only seems to work for flights and hentai though.

Maybe if it was more available and people were taught to use it it could be a little more popular. I think fundamentally it’s not such a foreign concept to say that you want specific things from specific categories. People do that kind of thinking routinely when searching for homes or cars.

Why hasn’t Cuba been ravaged by decades of severe hurricanes leaving the country in shambles?

Communist counter-HAARP efforts are more advanced than the CIA would like to admit.

Hmm… it’s actually kind of fun to come up with brainless conspiracy talk

Blue laws

Are they called that because they relate to blue balling?

At least you can turn it off in singleplayer and still use your mods there. That’s a pretty important consideration imho.

How do those community servers for RP work? Do they require mods? Do they still work?

Astronauts on the ISS are currently zipping along at at 7.67 km/s just fine.

And we’ve all been zipping around the sun at 29.78 km/s since each of our inceptions.

Looks like the negatives were not in a large enough film format, the remaster has letterboxing

Amazon sent a mouse mat that was the wrong box in the first place QcK Heavy instead of QcK, and even worse, inside was a dirty old mouse mat from a different brand entirely. It was annoying to post it back (internationally, they aren’t in my country) but they refunded without issue at least.

I’m surprised by this bit:

Part of the reason for the campaign’s move was the result of an FEC ruling this year that a candidate’s campaign and outside groups could coordinate their canvassing efforts with super PACs, and specifically share voter lists and data that they collect door to door. It means campaigns could share much of their labor- and cost-heavy ground efforts with groups that can take unlimited donations.

I thought the PACs need to be independant of the campaign and that’s how they don’t fall under campaign finance laws? Why would they suddenly be allowed to coordinate so closely?

Locked bootloaders can prevent that. Or proprietary hardware drivers can make it unworkable.

Does it pump heat variably in both directions?

Both their website and their twitter profile currently show this promo with the 14.88 price when I load the respective pages.

Edit: Let me upload screenshots for posterity’s sake

Scrolling back though their twitter profile form the current promo I see a few more prices that appear suspicious in retrospect: 9.88, 14.98 and 18.88 for example.

The article mentions a point of uncertainty:

As Cotlar noted, it’s not clear whether Lindell is in on the reference. In a video announcing the discount, Lindell is seen holding up two pillows and announcing the new discounted price as $14.98, even though both the official MyPillow website lists it as $14.88 with the promo code.

“I want to tell you about a current box store that put in an order — a big order — for our famous MyPillows, we made them all and got ready to ship them and they cancelled at the last minute,” Lindell said in the video, after lamenting that his company had been “cancelled” by “attacks that just keep coming.”

If you actually check my 14.98 link above there and follow through to the website both promo sites, the old https://www.mypillow.com/r251 from Sept 10 and now https://www.mypillow.com/r277 link to the same video hosted on vimeo https://vimeo.com/1008571598 title “video-output-2A900B79-65FC-44FB-8C21-E348491689FB” uploaded Sept 11, so they made the video with 14.98 first, and now just reused it even though they updated the sales price to 14.88

except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.

But I included that, didn’t I?

and back then “man” still refered to male and female persons

Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.

Sehr interessant. Dass man für die Nutzung des privaten Parkplatz einen Vertrag eingeht war mir nicht so bewusst, obwohl das eigentlich schon logisch ist.

Since the thread has grown large and I had trouble finding the comment I’ll just link it here (sorry the link is instance specific, it seems you can’t make relative ones)