In realtà il mondo attuale è pieno di tesi strampalate che passano per mainstream, quindi la mal argomentazione è il minore dei mali, leggo e valuto.
Hivemind vuol dire che se in una comunità hai una certa opinione, ogni opinione alternativa è vista come il male. E quello lo vedo spessissimo sui sub(reddit) o sui canali lemmy americani.
Non notizia un corno, visto che all’epoca si era subito puntato ai russi. Quanto alle motivazioni, l’autore dà delle ipotesi, come farebbe chiunque, visto che in testa alla gente non ci può andare. Bollare un legittimo dibattito come complottismo ( o altro ) è la tipica brutta abitudine occidentale odierna. Tra l’altro almeno tra italiani si riesce a discutere, ho provato nei sub anglosassoni, ma lì hanno un hivemind allucinante. Fossero tutti come te, magari.
Dogma? Complottano?
Biden:
During a joint news conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, President Biden is asked about the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
“If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”
When asked how, the president says, “I promise you, we will be able do that.”
Più chiaro di così… poi, se uno proprio non vuole vedere le cose, è inutile parlarci, alla fine negare l’evidenza è un problema tuo, non mio.
A me pare che il mare di cazzate le sparino i media che consideri autorevoli. Quindi complottista = informazione corretta?
C’è persino la dichiarazione di Biden che lo avrebbero fatto saltare, più di così… fino ad oggi di cavolate su questo attacco ne ho sentite solo dai media tradizionali, che ormai mi stupisco quando forniscono una notizia corretta.
To be an empire doesn’t mean be different
I think that you overextimate the american exceptionalism. In the xx century the europe was destroyed in the ww leaving the usa as the only state not touched by the wars. The rest of the world was lagging techlogicaly. Now the situation is different. Usa is a young country and it is not different from any other.
No one? The narrative is : fake news and tweets started all this. We need to regulate the internet. As the french revolution was started by the statements of Marie-Antoinette.
It is a link that the reasons of the riots were far more deep that a single tweet. The world is a little bit more complicated that button-> action.
The assault of the refugee hotel was in rotherham, and the riots were mostly in the north of england, in labour areas where the phenomenon of the asian grooming gang were most prevalent. I remember rotherham cause it was the most in(famous) case and also one of the places of the worst riots.
About spreading hate? Like one thousand rapes in one city, like everyone have one friend/relative victim of it and the problem is spreading hate? I hope you are jocking. ( i’m talking about rotherham )
Lol, so ban every news… We have politicians telling worst thing that a simple fake news and no one riot. Maybe a thousand of rapes in one city could cause it. Here ONE rape is a news with the name and the nationality of the criminal. Why the people that havr covered that are not in jail?
Ok, not a rant, a fake news…
false informations , even worst, newspapers publish false information ( rumors ) every day
The line between rants and call for violence is quite blurred in some cases IMHO
Yes, i think you talk about Peppino Impastato , he was killed cause he joked about mafia.
And normaly it is very difficult to be comdemned for a generic rant. It is easier in case of insults or defamtion, but it is mostly an high fee. Jailing a political adversary for a speech ( when we had a lot of political/mafia killing in the past ) is a big no. We had actual people killed for their speech.
Niente, sto perdendo tempo. Stai prendendo in giro e basta ( terrapiattista )
E poi che cavolo c’entrano i complottisti quando parlo dei subreddit come politics o worldnews. Ma sei in grado di leggere in inglese?