• 1 Post
  • 99 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle




  • RickRussell_CA@kbin.socialtoFediverse@lemmy.worldPower drunk mods
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc

    What you actually said:

    Out of interest are you religious or subject to some other form of mythical belief system? I ask because clearly you lack motivation for the truth, preferring hearsay and urban legend that I must assume supports a wider world view. by @Hackerman_uwu

    My thought: this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and I’d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.











  • I sign up for Patreons, watch/pay for them for awhile, and cancel several times a year.

    In all cases so far, membership benefits have persisted until the end of the billing period.

    Maybe the updated TOS language was to cover a future where that doesn’t happen, or it was written by somebody who doesn’t understand how the service actually works.






  • How do you prove the results are directly derived

    Mathematically? It’s a computer algorithm. Its output is deterministic, and both reproducible and traceable.

    Give the AI two copies of its training dataset, one with the copyrighted work, one without it. Now give it the same prompt and compare the outputs.

    The difference is the contribution of the copyrighted work.

    You mention Harry Potter. In Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. RDR Books, Warner Brothers lawyers argued that a reference encyclopedia for the Harry Potter literary universe was a derivative work. The court disagreed, on the argument that the human authors of the reference book had to perform significant creative work in extracting, summarizing, indexing and organizing the information from JK Rowling’s original works.

    I wonder if the court would use the same reasoning to defend the work of an AI?