SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 4th, 2024

help-circle














  • I was thinking about this. If anything, it’s the opposite because when invading your neighbor you will have to continue to live with them (especially if you plan to annex the territory) so you don’t completely destroy everything and disregard all consequences. Sometimes you have to invade a neighbor to stabilize a chaotic situation or end a genocide or something like that (see: Vietnam invading Cambodia).

    When an imperialist is invading on the other side of the world, they are incentivized to cause as much chaos as possible and destroy as much fixed capital as possible. They do this on the doorstep of their rivals to cause them problems (see: Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, etc) so more destruction and death is encouraged.

    When an imperialist is invading a neighbor with intent to annex them, they are incentivized to stabilize a situation and try not to destroy all of the productive forces.

    Neither imperialist invasion is good, but one is clearly worse than the other and more nakedly about self interest instead of self defense.