☭CommieWolf☆

  • 4 Posts
  • 283 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 3rd, 2022

help-circle
  • I think you have to start by understanding that “gaming” or “geek” culture seeming like it leads to reactionary views or pipelines has a lot more to do with who “gamers” actually are, not what their hobby happens to be.

    In most cases, videogames, table top RPGs, Warhammer 40k, pretty much any of the stuff you’d typically associate with the subculture, all of these things have been nearly entirely out of the reach of the vast majority of poorer working class kids in the past 30 odd years. As tough as it might be to hear, these have always been expensive and toys, hobbies and privileges to take part in, with maybe the exception of comic books, nearly everything else has a fairly steep entry fee, needing to buy computers, several books, figurines, videogames, merchandise etc.

    It’s really no wonder then, that the majority of people who are actually able to keep up with these costs will disproportionately be cis white men from the imperial core, as the group that happens to be at the top of the social structure of the world with the most amount of disposable income. And I think this is where the problem really stems from.

    It’s not that geeks and gamers just happen to be more likely to become reactionary, it’s actually somewhat the opposite. Reactionaries, through their inherent privileged position in the world, are simply more able to get into this lifestyle in the first place. Geek culture and fascist/reactionary views might seem correlated, but they’re both just part of a path of least resistance for a certain type of person.




  • Depends which channel you’re watching of the two he has. His main channel is outstanding for 99% of topics he covers, well sourced, researched and presented. His alternative streaming clips channel is much more rough, it’s clear the guy’s got no filter whatsoever and is willing to go off on anyone for better or for worse, which makes him come off as pretty damn unlikeable at times.

    But overall it’s a small compromise for the good stuff he does put out, so he’s fine in my book.


  • As others have said, there is no way of enforcing any sort of age minimum here, or anywhere else really without requiring invasive personal information to be shown as proof. So this point already means it’s pretty much pointless to have any real age minimum rule.

    But I do agree that some of our frequent posters, who I have a very high suspicion of being quite young, 10-16 or thereabouts, can be somewhat annoying at times when you’re looking to engage in something more serious or substantial. But the truth is that children make up an absurdly large amount of the internet’s userbase in general, so it’s statistically nearly guaranteed that we’ll end up with some around here.

    I think the best solution would be to either just ignore them if you’re not in the mood to deal with that type of thing, or in extreme cases, if you find it’s getting too annoying, there is a block feature which you can use should you find the need.




  • Not exclusively, it’s been used for a very long time to target socialists and indigenous people in the Americas as well, Bolivia, Argentina, and Chile’s dictatorships used it as a dog-whistle against their indigenous people, and perhaps even more so against their socialist movements.

    During the cold war the “Judeo Christian” thing started to gain traction with reactionaries in the west as a way of distancing themselves from the “Judeo Bolsheviks” in the socialist bloc, how their values where better because they combined Judaism with Christianity, rather than Marxism, which was inherently meaningless because neither had anything to do with Judaism, and western liberalism has arguably little to do with Christian values either.




  • “Poor soft power projection” is just revealed a most blatantly western lens when it comes to assessing a nation’s culture. The idea of “soft power” as if its a good thing only works if you see your own cultural artforms and media to be superior to those of others, and subsequently end up supplanting that of a “weaker” culture. US “soft power” only serves to stifle local culture by overshadowing it with foreign US media and norms, and in some cases eradicating the interest and cultural norms of a people (particularly in the youth). Most Europeans all follow the same fashion, watch the same films and listen to the same music, much of which comes from the US, and this is supposedly a good thing? I’d say that regardless of who’s doing it, this sort of “power projection” isn’t something to yearn for.






  • This is an excuse that people have made for the deprogram guys for over 2 years now. I know because I myself was under the same impression. But this is proven to be completely bullshit and irrelevant for quite a while now. The whole “they are appealing to libs and want to take a centrist approach to sensitive topics” crap completely went out the window the moment they decided to comment in support of Gaza in the wake of the genocide since last October. All their channels got blacklisted from advertisers and they decided to throw caution to the wind and drop any pretense in their revolutionary messaging, since they have nothing to lose anymore. Just look at any of JT’s videos since October, and this is most evident.

    If the goal was to cultivate a following of liberals and western moderates then start to slowly get them radicalized, it has failed or rather the plan has been long derailed. They ended up attracting a load of ultras and weirdos, which they’ll never convince of anything regardless. I think even they know this at some level because their messaging has shifted.

    If they’re ready to tell the truth about Gaza, then they should do the same for Ukraine, simple as that. From here on, any milquetoast or weak spirited commentary should be rightfully called out, we should expect better from them.