GPUs: not even once

I am in the same boat, except all of the software I’ve ever written has been TeX

I’m sorry

giving contrived examples to undergrads to demonstrate why dp[i][j] is a shit table name or why ∞ is better than float('inf') or MAX_INT in pseudocode

that sound you can hear is my despairing screaming[0]

VPN client where … jump through the hoops of learning a new shitty client

(not a pitch, but multiple commercial references) I really liked how simple tunnelbear made this for a lot, and also quite like how slick the wireguard desktop-style handling is (you can see this for example with fly.io’s integration to that). I think there’s long context here, and if you buy me a beer I could rant in detail

PS: There is Goldwarden

oh good, it’s in Go, my other code allergy

shitposting aside, re the password manager thing: @self and I have co-ranted in dms, and about similar gripes.

so, by way of idea, loose laundry list for foundations/design: modern crypto (jfc why is so much still going “yeah gpg is fine”), crdt sync, a sane fucking language to build everything on, own-devices friendly (in the “you can sync device to device peer-wise” sense, vs the “there’s a remote server broker” sense), and pretty okay™ interfaces for client building/extensibility

alas: my main workstation is (non-slate) macos, and it’s unchangeable for the foreseeable future

good to know those (already) exist as options, though. if I can find some spoons I’ll try look around and see if there’s maybe something similar I can hack up/agglutinate from what’s around

Their desktop app is a bit shit anyway

I haven’t even tried it yet because I’m real “ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh” about even the idea of a js-/ts-based gui client for my password manager. largely because I’ve met too many js/ts devs and I outright don’t trust their competence and processes. so your post is definite motivation for me to eyeball some of the other clients too

this is such a mess, holy shit

and only on .com? I have some very pointed questions about the maturity of the verification program/design

also, how are you liking bitwarden?

I really need to kill off my current password manager and bitwarden’s looking like the least worst of current options (esp. when paired with something like vaultwarden instead of running a fucking nodejs sync server on the internet), but also some of it seems quite stunted[0]

it’s gotten so bad that I’ve started pondering writing my own, because good god does basically every option out there depress me

[0] - no global hotkeys? the fuck

last time it came up, tuta was the least worst of the mail options. it’s not the same offering as proton’s in-garden encrypted, but nothing is afaik. rest of it is pretty okay (I have some (not all[0]) domains on there)

the rest of the things I don’t have a direct recommendation in part because [0] and in part because I don’t use computers entirely like how a lot of people do. that said

storage: backblaze storage pricing is not bad. they might have a desktop app thing? calendar: caldav is a dark art beyond my ken - I haven’t even got that shit playing nice on my own things[3]. fuck knows who does this well. vpn: mullvad[1] (has quite recently had another full assessment published). maybe njalla[2]?

[0] - I’m one of those crotchety fuckers that still has a whole pile of self-hosted things that have been going 15~20y

[1] - seems okay and to have their head on straight. haven’t used myself.

[2] - also haven’t used it myself, comes from some of the folks of the TPB gang

[3] - admittedly I haven’t tried that hard because I don’t need it much, but it is extremely goddamn annoying to debug from clients

maybe that’s how the moon got mad - annoying goddamn chatbots flying in its view the whole time

mild guess: “golden boys, with the the 30+ years required to look Politically Evolved”? and of course the selection factors involved from even just getting to that point and the stylist/image handling that that involves

there’s also an element of the system does as designed, and there’s an element of self-reinforcing delivery/production of these ghouls

yep I think so too. as I think I posted here a while back:

25068   + Oct 12 GitHub          ( 20K) Your free GitHub Copilot access is ending soon

and now suddenly it’s Launched Again! but with limits. gotta whet those appetites just a bit more! sales will totes follow soon!

are they allergic to water? I may have a solution if they’re allergic to water

ah but did you tell them in CP437 or something fancy (like any text encoding after 1996)? 🤨🤨🥹

I fucking love how goddamn structured kym is ito semiotics and symbolism

it’s an amazing confluence that might not have happened if persons unknown didn’t care, but they did. and thus we have it! phenomenal

“I just want to be a cog in the machiiiiiiine why are you bringing up these things that make me think?! ew ethics and integrity are so hard”

I actually had to doublecheck context on this but rofldamn this is savage

brava

oh i know wittle hary pawter! son of a woodcraftsen, right? over yonder town way?

been a little while since we had A Programming Dot Dev here, I think. guess it was time

it is chefskiss.tiff that I keep “having conversations”[0] where people tell me that “AI” is “well-suited” to “data extraction that traditional tools struggle with” and then datapoints like this keep. coming. up.

[0] - I…am not inviting these. the promptfans just Defend their twisted little hearts away, unasked. it is tedious.

oh good I needed a replacement free host for my other-other wireguard bouncy box. thanks aws

depends on audience / person? and also maybe teacher

I’ve stepped people through essentials with e.g. idea “tell me how to make coffee” (as an intro to procedurals and dependency) all the way through many other types/shapes, through lego/blockly/whatever style teaching, and through outright “imagine this is a magic box and ${thing} comes out the other side” stepped iteration. sometimes you can jump straight to “hey so here’s a language that means specific things and here’s what that means” and go from there

so yeah I guess for my part I’d say I attune to the recipient. but for advice toward teacher I guess I’d attune that toward what I figure they’d be good at teaching

so… what’re you good at (teaching)?

snrk