

@julian I have the same hesitations around having categories follow user accounts. Most users are not categories, and they do not post categorically.
But some are. Satire accounts. Bot accounts. Institutional accounts, as you’ve called out. These are fairly safe bets, and it would be nice to allow admins the choice to roll the dice.
But another paradigm to explore is lists, and there are a number of ways to represent those. /world could be reconfigured into /feed (stepping on the toes of the Feeds plugin), with users being able to create arbitrary feeds for themselves.
Or lists could be represented as user-created pseudo-categories, given the UX of a forum category, but being personal to the user. They could be presented in /world exclusively, or appended to the bottom of the user’s categories list.
Forum-wide lists could be considered, creating global pseudo-categories defined by admins or moderators, with a slightly modified layout and/or visual language.
This is really the transformation of a long standing medium. There’s a huge possibility and design space here.
This has been an attitude more generally on Mastodon over the 3 years that I’ve been there. There’s this deep undercurrent of “finally, we’re getting the attention we deserve” but also “shut up and let us talk”. It seems that people who are used to being the only people in the room are craving an audience, not people actually using their toys.
There’s a group of people – developers or otherwise – that saw the fediverse as their private little sandbox, and openly resent anyone else coming into the space, or at the very least, anyone else coming into their space and not following their rules.
It’s been a significant blocker to adoption for the platform, and for the fediverse as a whole.