He wrote it in a tongue-in-cheek article.
I don’t like the guy, but I read the article and I chuckled a couple of times.
He wrote it in a tongue-in-cheek article.
I don’t like the guy, but I read the article and I chuckled a couple of times.
When I click any of these links, I get an error…
Human women
As opposed to what, robot women?
(All women are human.)
Recycling uses even more energy than producing from scratch and also has a huge environmental impact
Alright, alright. With that extraordinary claim, I’m going to need you to back it up.
And we are delving into red-herring territory. The original discussion was focused on green energy surplus.
Infrastructure can be dismantled, its materials recycled, and then replaced with a newer, more efficient thing. And the energy to power this operation? Renewable.
I understood that. But I don’t see how you came down to this conclusion simply because someone put Linux inside Linux.
When you put matryoshka russian dolls one inside the other, do you also think “man, we live in a simulation”?
Good points. Giving the surplus to folks who otherwise produce their energy with carbon sounds sensible.
What’s funny is that if we were talking about the quantity of petrol that we use no one would question the fact that it’s stupid to not push people to stop wasting it…
This is a false equivalency, because petrol is a limited resource. Renewable energy isn’t (by its own definition.)
But I do see the validity of your other points.
“I hate this option, so instead of voting for a more sensible option, I’ll directly mention that I’ll vote for the worst option ever. In a subtle way so that I’m not too obvious. But hopefully people reading me will be influenced, even by a tiny bit, to vote for the worst option ever. Because I’m being paid for the people who supports the worst option ever.”
Oh, we know.
Downvoters didn’t appreciate your pun. I did!
Aw shucks. Sucks.
Are there any articles out there I could read more about this?
Technically, yes. But the article already mentioned the amount of effort for the brute force to succeed (that is, practically never, if the phrase is truly random.)
But anyway. With regular passwords, the attackers already have a list: the alphabet plus numbers and symbols. Not really that different.
You’re arguing with a trollbot. Don’t bother.
“I am a russian propaganda bot.”
its* creator.
Oh!