Mike Macgirvin 🖥️@fediversity.sitetoThreadiverse Working Group@community.nodebb.org•Re: 400e, 7888, and conversation containers
1·
12 days agohttps://codeberg.org/silverpill/feps/src/branch/main/171b/fep-171b.md
It isn’t so much “one FEP to rule them all” as it is that Conversation Containers stands on the shoulders of giants.
That wasn’t in my original doco and I’m not using it currently. I’ll need to see what problem is solved by having Context before I offer an opinion.
I recall @[email protected] took issue with the fact that ‘context’ and ‘target’ are the same object and he felt this was duplicitous. There’s also a bit of an issue that a “partial object” (defined in FEP-400e) isn’t really defined anywhere in the base specs either - and perhaps using Context will help resolve that.
Since it’s a SHOULD, my original implementation is arguably compliant with the FEP without it.