Je pense qu’ils doivent être inquiets des attaques informatiques si le vote par internet devient possible pour tout le monde. Je pense que pour l’instant le public visé est trop petit pour motiver les acteurs malveillants. Rien qu’un DDoS de quelques heures pourrait fragiliser l’élection.
Je viens de lire un autre point intéressant sur le fait qu’il y a plus de risque de pression d’un tiers quand on vote en privé que quand on vote dans l’isoloir d’un lieu public.

Need a new survival craft game where you can tame isopods to collect precious metals.

Ok, people will always fuck up, so what do you do?

The majority of industries that actually have immediate and potentially fatal consequences do exactly this, and have been for more than a generation now.

All the organizations (including public) getting ransomware and data stolen, it’s because the consequences are not that bad? It is not gross negligence?

Mullvad has been working great for me on Arch Linux and Android.

GDPR pocket books

Je suis d’accord avec le problème du manque de pluralisme ici, ça fait un peu pensée unique parfois, et la modération n’est pas particulièrement politiquement modérée non plus. Je ne vois pas trop de solution, cette orientation de départ repousse l’arrivée de diversité.
Les tentatives d’apporter autre chose, des contenus moins politisés par exemple, sont souvent noyées par les postes politiques. Après les élections ce sera les negotiations et les cohabitations puis 2027, je ne pense pas que ça va cesser.

They tend to be one-hit wonders.

Formally yes, but I believe that’s an (American English?) informal way of speaking where “nobody” actually means “anybody”. Similarly to how “I don’t need no man” means “I don’t need any man”.

I find 27⁰C comfortable when not moving at home.

🤔
Don’t = -1
Never = -1
Not = -1
-1 * -1 * -1 = -1
~ They don’t have to explain themselves for nobody.
So it’s the same comment.
Let me know if I have made a mistake.

What annoys me with this culture is when they expect foreigners to use the same exhuberant language and they think something is wrong with you if you don’t.

You’re welcome back!

I feel like it means: we are not like Nintendo, we make video games for adults (and children who want to play like adults).

No, it’s Becky.

2001 especially.

Left or right is an economic stance

What about the social stance?

What’s the reference to Brandon Sanderson?

Sounds good philosophically, but I can’t help but feel like it could turn into a dystopia.

Who will be in charge of defining what is to be considered true, and what should be known by the accused? Who will be able to challenge this truth giver?
How do you make the difference between false information out of ignorance and willfully misleading information?

Out of fear, will every politician, even honest ones, be forced to introduce their speech with some precautionary standard phrase like “This is fully based on assumptions and the truth of those statements cannot be guaranteed” like people say “I am not a lawyer”, eventually putting every political intention on an equal level of uncertainty? (That’s standard troll farm goal)

I believe this job currently belongs to journalism, although we know how imperfect that is, will a law and a Justice system do better?

Right, I wanted to avoid saying AI but didn’t pick the right one, I am switch to gen-ML.

Dang, that’s a dog’s life.