I think if you are a part of those three then you are automatically part of GB

It’s about the latter but it doesn’t have to work, just looks like you took action to solve a Daily Mail agenda…

Yeah, so oats plus oats plus water

Is that not just oatmeal and water?

Difficult but legally required by them, including establishing your bona fides.

Really? Like where are you thinking about?

Boomers have been in power for a long long time and the technology we are debating is as a result of their investment and prioritisation. So am not sure they are very afraid of it.

They would rise but not uniformly esp if we could charge accurately. So we would start to penalise the more destructive models and encourage lower transport choices.

We can condemn Hamas and Israel in the same breath. We don’t have to support Israel as the agency to “remove” Hamas.

Could be that that is employee headcount and not including contractors.

Depends if they also evaporate.

You would have to show how you made sufficient surplus from sales minus the cost of labour to pay off the loan. The business case usually has a solid section on this.

Obviously there is a future made of automation and ai but that is also the end of capitalism as the workers have not been paid to buy the product you just made.

Only the eye for an eye was the bible, the world goes blind was Ghandi.

Seems sensible but if we imagine that by some measure, like PISA, our children seemed to be stagnating or going backwards, who will be accountable? Then a PM will say, elect me and i will take responsibility.

It’s annoying but also inevitable for as long as we demand that our PMs fix things and be accountable.

Because the notes are in markdown, so are portable forever even if Obsidian went away.

Shame, i love reader mode and would happily have the entire internet in that form.

Is there a way to make that happen automatically? Like always be in reader mode.

Not actually true if we mean left as in ownership by the people and the right means ownership by capital.

Authoritarian or totalitarian are not the same as right.

Well, not to diss on giving to charity but two technical arguments against. One is, you are acting as an additional tax on the worker (the source of the surplus) and then redirecting that tax to charity. It’s fine but the elected government has democratically selected priorities that they can rarely fund so it is better to just give it to the treasury. And 2, just don’t collect this tax in the first place, allowing the worker to spend it on the local economy.

The if is JC running?