

'A new generation of Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robots and computers, with the new GPP feature.”
“GPP feature?” said Arthur. “What’s that?”
“Oh, it says Genuine People Personalities.”
“Oh,” said Arthur, “sounds ghastly.”’
'A new generation of Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robots and computers, with the new GPP feature.”
“GPP feature?” said Arthur. “What’s that?”
“Oh, it says Genuine People Personalities.”
“Oh,” said Arthur, “sounds ghastly.”’
I am not sure if you are a student of history but twice before the Germans decided to go to war and have as their foe the world.
I am not sure 1.5m Germans all deciding on a single course of action is something to be happy about.
deleted by creator
That is exactly the point, LLM aim to simulate the chaotic best guess flow of the human mind, to be conscious and at least present the appearance of thinking and from that to access and process facts but not be a repository of facts in themselves. The accusation here that the model constructed a fact and then built on it is missing the point, this is exactly the way organic minds work. Human memory is constantly reworked and altered based on fresh information and simple musings and the new memory taken as factual even while it is in large part fabricated, and to an increasing extent over time. Many of our memories of past events bear only cursory fidelity to the actual details of the events themselves to the point that they could be defined as imagined. We still take these imagined memories as real and act upon them exactly as has been done here by the AI model.
Google: ‘I am bored, today lets make ourselves a legitimate target in a war’.
All men can be educated to treat people with respect, to say otherwise is plain misandry but of course calling that out does not virtue signal quite as easily as misogyny. Every word of misandry spoken detracts from your case of misogyny because given freedom the genders are equally prone to those thoughts, understanding that is how it is removed from society.
Thanks that is a better summary, it seems to find a workable solution in better visibility which is not so far from what I said about camera surveillance. But even so the only real cure is improved and dedicated male education which I also suggested, nothing I said I thought was misogynistic but a certain sort of mind likes to ape words in a meaningless way. As to the paper I did think about reading it but then I thought about something else, my comment was on the summary.
What is interesting here is the downvoting my comments are getting, smacks of exactly the sort of pack mentality harassment Sweden is seeking to address.
I don’t think you know what misogynist means.
This summary is shocking, it just repeats that the place needed to be safer, so they made it safer and now everyone feels safer over and over but they don’t say how. From the banish part in the title I would guess they excluded men which is very sad and no real solution, the women are still just forced to hide, they just have a larger place to hide in. What is needed is male education and some way to neutralise the physical threat from men. Maybe complete camera coverage, it is a privacy problem but it would be a strong deterrent if prosecution was guaranteed.
It has been known for a while that an Einstein Ring is actually an at a distance simulation artifact, arising not so much as a bulk processing problem but from generation redundancy at the very large or very small scale. Often the simplest fix is turning the whole thing off and on again.
Work to have a destabilising leader elected in an opposing country. Succeed and destabilise that country. Realise a destabilised opposing country is worse for your country.
See that bandwagon over there, I am going to jump on it.
But everyone already is on it.
Merde.
Poochie we have to move past this, the reason you failed Basic Physics is not because the rich are trying to hold you back.
I think he thinks about China as much as he thinks about last night’s supper, he knows ultimately China will back down, not because it is weak but because it is sane. Putin created Trump to perform a few basic tasks and having gained power in such an unopposed manner he is now up to whatever takes his fancy in the moment and that will be as problematic for Russia as it will for everyone else.
Too little information is as bad as too much, it is a difficult balance. The problem with information dissemination last time was not oversaturation but that people latched onto ridiculous conspiracy narratives and that derives from lack of basic education not too much news.
I don’t think any concerns meet that criteria.
Chopping up the ship to sell for firewood while you are sailing on it.