i should be gripping rat

  • 140 Posts
  • 395 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle






  • I want to start by saying: you don’t need to have a link to post to Politics! I think there’s probably a subset of Beeple that prefer that anything politics related stays to that community, so they can filter it out easily if they don’t want to engage with politics. My personal belief is that EVERYONE should be engaged with politics, but I know bad days happen and on those days just seeing Trump’s name can push some people into a deeper spiral.

    But you make a good point. For how conservative and corrupt this court is, it’s surprising that they haven’t been more brazen. In a lot of cases, when they haven’t gone with the more politically-conservative ruling, it seems like they’ve aimed to reject the conservative argument on technical grounds more than anything. That said, they went scorched earth on the biggest rulings that have taken place since 2020, and to me, that says it all. They hear Congress and the President openly questioning their integrity, and they know this will lead to actual reforms of the Court if they let this continue. So they go back in their cave, and go back to making quiet little inconsequential rulings wherever possible. Then, when the bribe check is big enough or the ruling is important enough to the Conservative mission, they’ll come back out swinging with a 6-3 ruling that ruins all of our lives even more.

    But idk. I’m no expert, and it sounds like you are more plugged in to SCOTUS news than I am. Just some of my thoughts.




  • probably true for a lot of people. i think the joke in this comic is that many of us grow to appreciate the little things more as we grow older, and that leads us to being excited about things that our younger selves would have characterized as “boring”. It’s the same as rewatching a movie you thought was boring when you were 20, and discovering that it’s now your favorite movie ever.


  • The accusation from two former Twitch employees, as posted on Twitter, was:

    He got banned because got caught sexting a minor in the then existing Twitch whispers product. He was trying to meet up with her at TwitchCon. The powers that be could read in plain text.

    Beahm’s direct response to that specific allegation is:

    Were there twitch whisper messages with an individual minor back in 2017? The answer is yes. Were there real intentions behind these messages, the answer is absolutely not. These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate, but nothing more.

    So the detail of “sexting” is “in dispute” in the sense that the predator denies the allegations, but predators always deny allegations. And the fact that his formal denial still included details like “sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate” is really sus.

    So to me, saying “we don’t know if it was sexting, all we know for sure is that inappropriate messages were sent” has the same energy as saying “no criminal charges have ever been brought against me”. We don’t need photo evidence to know he was a creep.