As students return to college campuses across the United States, administrators are bracing for a resurgence in activism against the war in Gaza.

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    You say this but if I saw someone punch a Nazi, I would cheer and forget who it was if asked by the police.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      I believe that you would, but it would make you an enemy of free speech. Either a society allows the expression of ideas widely perceived as harmful, or it only permits people to express those ideas which the powers that be approve of. Throughout history, the powers that be always claimed that they were suppressing just the harmful ideas, and they were almost always lying. I don’t trust them with that authority.

      • HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        That’s a false dilemma. There’s a middle ground between allowing only approved speech and allowing any speech whatsoever. And we already make that distinction. Fascists don’t believe in free speech and threaten the rights of others through threats of violence, which isn’t protected speech. Likewise fraud, libel, slander, blackmail, false advertising, and CSAM aren’t protected and are considered harmful.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          There’s a difference between expressing an idea and making a speech act. Harmful speech acts, including “true threats” in the legal sense (e.g. credible threats of imminent harm, as opposed to expressions of support for policies that would be harmful) and all the other things that you mention* may be regulated without impinging on the free exchange of ideas (although one must watch out for attempts to suppress ideas by claiming that they’re speech acts).

          I’m not talking about a mob of fascists threatening to attack someone there and then (illegal) or actually attacking (illegal, and cause for justified violence in self-defense). I’m talking about a peaceful march of fascists carrying signs expressing support for national socialism. They get to march.

          *I do find it odd that simply possessing images of children being raped is illegal whereas possessing images of, for example, children being murdered is not (even if those images of murder also used for the purpose of sexual gratification).

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            I do find it odd that simply possessing images of children being raped is illegal

            😬

      • Kalkaline
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 days ago

        Promoting the systematic genocide of minorities immediately disqualifies you from meaningful conversation. You deserve a punch in the face for being a Nazi and defending Nazis.