Isn’t that a prerequisite for enshitification? Publicly-traded companies are required (by law, I think) to maximize profits for their shareholders, even if that means utterly ruining their original product (Reddit, Boeing, etc.), yes? What do you think?

  • Corroded
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t think it’s required by law for a publicly traded company to increase profits. I think that’s a side effect of shareholders voting.

    If Microsoft held a vote on whether or not disclose a report covering diversity I feel like the board would recommend against it and a majority of voters would agree because it could mean decreasing their stock’s value.

    There is a thing called ethical investing but that can mean investing in stocks that will see lower gains.

    All-in-all I feel like it depends a lot on the core of the company and what percentage of the company belongs to different people.


    To be clear: I am not a professional and am drunk. This is just my two cents on the topic.