• tearsintherain
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is sensitive about these details? The NYT cutout in the link lists deliveries after they’ve been made, so how would they be intercepted?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Maybe the problem is that if Russia knows where and when ammunition was received, even if it’s a few days ago, they can intercept it on its way to the frontlines?
      I can’t read the article, maybe someone else can give better explanation?

    • Martín@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.

      • tearsintherain
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Haha, This commentary is paranoid nonsense. Intercept deliveries after they’re made? Russia now has time travel? Locations named like ‘Poland’, ‘Spain’? Oh wow, thats some serious location giveaway. If the war is going bad, don’t make excuses for hypothetical security concerns which somehow got past the US govt and Pentagon from a newspaper?? If anything focus on who caused the delays for those weapons to arrive which is an actual issue, no time travel need.