The NYT informs Russia about foreign aid deliveries
The @nytimes has published sensitive tactical details about the US arms deliveries to #Ukraine which leads to very specific risks of Russia intercepting these deliveries. Is this necessary? I don’t think so.
yes, nyt is shit. however it’s important we ask ourselves questions:
- where did they get this info?
- how sensitive are this info anyway? aren’t they available to public?
also, i got blocked by the site. do they have the article in question in there?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Maybe the problem is that if Russia knows where and when ammunition was received, even if it’s a few days ago, they can intercept it on its way to the frontlines?
I can’t read the article, maybe someone else can give better explanation?Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.
deleted by creator
Harm limitation is for real journalists not for whatever NYT “reporters” do.
deleted by creator
Did I mention any of those in a positive light anywhere? The news was about the NYT and I’m not going to give them a pass just because there’s worse media.
Yup, @[email protected], what you’re engaging in here is pure whataboutism. Fox, Carlson and company would’ve happily helped here, but they didn’t. NYT did.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
