• AllNewTypeFace
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wonder how much chance the conservatives have of bagging some of their votes. I imagine most will go further left (Greens or Socialist Party) with preferences to Labour before the tories, though if enough leak through it could put Dutton in the Lodge.

    • zero_gravitas@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The Coalition voted for the anti-CFMEU legislation too, but I guess people could preference Coalition above Labor just to hurt Labor in the 2PP figures.

      I’m not sure it’d send any clearer a message, though, than just preferencing Greens and socialists above Labor but still putting Labor above Coalition. Seems like a Labor government would be more likely to repeal the laws than a Coalition one, under pressure from a bolstered Greens bloc.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        but I guess people could preference Coalition above Labor just to hurt Labor in the 2PP figures.

        I feel like reactionary swing voting like this would not be a common behaviour among union members. Like the whole point of joining a union is that you have some pretty entrenched beliefs about worker’s rights, and one party here clearly has a worse record than the other in that regard. Like the thought occurred to me too, but I think you guys are right that people going further left to independents or The Greens, before ultimately preferencing Labor above Liberal, is the most likely change that could occur.

    • dillekant@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s also the possibility of a split. If enough of the unions want to split, and it does look like it, it’s possible that “left Labor” and “right Labor” split into two parties.