• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Streamlining” has been their mantra since Oblivion. TES6 is going to be even more watered down than everything else, but also crammed full of useless things. I’m willing to bet they’ll let you build a town. But the town will do nothing and won’t have any impact at all in the game.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Yeah, it will be bad. I don’t really understand how some people can be excited about it.

        It will be passable, it will have a few moments, but in the end you’ll be left wanting and it will set in just how disinterested the owner of the franchise is in any problem that doesn’t preclude sales. It will sell well enough in preorders just because it’s a Skyrim sequel.

  • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Skyrim lead designer Bruce Nesmith explained that Larian’s success is an “exception” to the last decade of gaming trends, but one that shows a shift in desire from gamers.

    There’s been no shift, we’ve just been ignored and under-served for around two decades. But, sure, keep ignoring us.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Stats are incredibly boring. People want to see upgrades that actually do something, stuff like perks. Those are far more interesting and tangible than leveling your CHR stat from 32 to 33.

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Pfft, just give us stats that improve by doing the thing (eg. agility that improves by jumping around and visibly improves jump height every time it increases). I’d rather that nuance over a block of text with a witty name that gives a massive instant boon. Tangibility is right, but the numbers aren’t the boring part.

        • overload@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Tell me about it. Skyrim for all its accolades kind of fails as an RPG in the sense that your character can do pretty much everything, but your run speed/jump height is static.

          Increasing health/magic/stamina was a really lame way to handle levelling IMO.

          It would be a shame if they streamlined the RPG systems even more for TESVI

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Magic System was simplified, but was made more reactive with things like igniting oil spills

    Man, fuck oil spills. You walk into the first dungeon, you set fire to an oil spill with a spell. Then you’ll try dropping one of those laterns, which are always conveniently placed above the Exxon Valdez. And then, that’s it, the fun is over, the joke is told, that’s all you can do with oil spills.

    I’d also really like to know what other examples there are of it being more reactive. You can’t freeze the ground to make enemies slip. You can’t zap a river to fry some fishes. You can’t set fire to wood.

    It really feels like some dev thought to themselves, we’ve got oil lamps, maybe we could have some of that drip out, and then the Sweet Little Lies guy said fuck yes, put lakes of oil into every dungeon, so I can claim we’ve made the magic system more reactive or some shit.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Skyrim turning star-signs into shrines was a brilliant move. Didn’t oversimplify their effects, didn’t put the quiz before the lesson, didn’t give you any reason to delete a character and start over. And by making them in-world objects, at disparate locations, you couldn’t just open a menu and rewrite yourself. So much streamlining, especially in the Elder Scrolls, paves over interesting systems in the name of approachability. But occasionally they nail it.

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good to know they keep going their own way. We got more than enough carbon copy games nowadays, always excited for something unique.

    • Golden Lox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      are you suggesting that the elder scrolls series, specifically the next one coming out made and published by bethesda/ microsoft, is going to be unique?

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes they are. Why the hell would you not? What a toxic comment, we haven’t even seen anything about the game and you’re already complaining about it simply existing.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You haven’t seen it, you haven’t played it, you don’t work there. You just want to shit on things people like

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          While all those things are likely true, Bethesda also does have a pretty consistent track record of releasing the exact same game over and over, so it’s not exactly an unreasonable prediction that they’ll do it again.

          • Thaurin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I’m sorry, are you calling Arena, Daggerfall, Morrowind, Oblivion and Skyrim the exact same game? That’s a bit disingenuous.

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Brother, these games are thirteen to thirty years old and therefore not in any way relevant to the discussion.

              For our sanity we must let TES go. Since Skyrim, Bethesda has only developed Simplified Skyrim In The Wasteland, Buggy Skyrim in the Multiplayer Wasteland, and Very Boring Skyrim in Empty Space. And about a bajillion outright Skyrim re-releases.

              Their current leadership is incapable of acknowledging the failures of Starfield, from uninspired game design to extremely outdated engine that holds back the very fundamental vision of the game. Since Bethesda’s leadership hasn’t changed or acknowledged their wrongs, we have every reason to believe that TES6 will make the same mistakes. They do not have the means of their ambition anymore.

  • basmati@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Well it’s good to have confirmation TES ended with Skyrim and we won’t have to port oblivion to yet another game, ever, for any reason.

    • Fashim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Even Skyrim wasn’t that great compared to its predecessors, the storylines all culminated to the point where you were the dragonborn, master wizard, super thief and ultimate warrior. The quests where pretty dull for the most part and a lot of the unique world building of TES had been replaced with generic RPG themes.

      I mean sure dumb down the character/points systems so the game is more appealable to the masses but the quality of Bethesda’s games have been taking a nosedive for awhile.

      The last game I bought from them was fallout 4 and it was a massive letdown. I never bothered with a second playthrough because I couldn’t stomach all the fetch/bad quality quests.

      After watching the shitshow of fallout 76 and starfield I know I made the right choice to never buy anything from this money grubbing shitty company again.

      • swab148@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        I kinda wanna get Fallout 4, but only so I can play Fallout London.