• Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    analogous structures like these helped me break down the false barrier in my mind about men and women being fundamentally different as if the two reproductive castes are monoliths. they aren’t. they are staggeringly similar. Especially mind-blowing was learning that the default structure is what we classify as “female”.

    Every mammalian fetus starts development along the female bodyplan, and unless acted upon by the external impulses of a y-chromosome, the mammal’s bodyplan will continue to develop in a way that appears entirely female, EVEN IF the y-chromosome is actually present.

    Such as: If it’s there but it doesn’t work (if it’s malformed or partially missing), or if it’s there AND it works but the REST of the cells aren’t responding to the androgens. Turns out the X “set” contains all the instructions needed to make a sentient being, even if it’s very likely that this being will not be capable of reproduction through traditional means.

    The point is, everything you can point to on the male anatomy, all those tissues exist in the female anatomy, they’re just distributed differently. And that’s freaking cool.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    26 days ago

    Very cool, but it’s annoying the horse’s hoof is covered over, and this isn’t really linguistics.

  • AllNewTypeFace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Meanwhile, about half of a cat’s hind leg is what in humans would be the foot.

  • aname@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Bears who are heel strikers like humans, unlike cats, dogs and many others animals, have eerily familiar looking back leg structure

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      humans aren’t really heel strikers, go run barefoot and you’ll realize why.

      turns out slamming your heel into the ground hurts, what we use the heel for is standing on it.

      • aname@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Walking humans and bears definitely heel strike. I’m not talking about running.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          even then we don’t put our weight on the heel first (unless we’re wearing terrible modern shoes that force us to do so), we put weight on the heel and forefoot approximately at the same time.

          • aname@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            I have been to the real world a couple of times and having seen some people stomp like crazy, I can 100% say you cannot generalize like that.