• Octospider@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Where is Ja-Rule? Somebody please get ahold of Ja so I can make sense of all this.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Jennifer Lopez will be joining Kamala Harris at a campaign rally in Las Vegas Thursday, Rolling Stone has learned. As previously announced, Mexican rock band Maná will also perform at the Nevada rally.

    Nevada makes sense, since it’s a battleground state. But California?

    Edit: I’m an idiot but will leave this comment up for others to see. Las Vegas is in Nevada, not California.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago
    Rolling Stone - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Rolling Stone:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that Rolling Stone has generally reliable coverage on culture matters (i.e., films, music, entertainment, etc.). Rolling Stone’s opinion pieces and reviews, as well as any contentious statements regarding living persons, should only be used with attribution. The publication’s capsule reviews deserve less weight than their full-length reviews, as they are subject to a lower standard of fact-checking. See also Rolling Stone (politics and society), 2011–present, Rolling Stone (Culture Council).
    Wiki: unreliable - According to a 2021 RfC discussion, there is unanimous consensus among editors that Rolling Stone is generally unreliable for politically and societally sensitive issues reported since 2011 (inclusive), though it must be borne in mind that this date is an estimate and not a definitive cutoff, as the deterioration of journalistic practices happened gradually. Some editors have said that low-quality reporting also appeared in some preceding years, but a specific date after which the articles are considered generally unreliable has not been proposed. Previous consensus was that Rolling Stone was generally reliable for political and societal topics before 2011. Most editors say that Rolling Stone is a partisan source in the field of politics, and that their statements in this field should be attributed. Moreover, medical or scientific claims should not be sourced to the publication.
    Wiki: unreliable - There is unanimous consensus among editors that Culture Council articles (of URL form rollingstone.com/culture-council/*) are self-published sources and are, in most aspects, equivalent to Forbes and HuffPost contributors. Editors, however, have also expressed concern that at least some of the content published is promotional and thus not usable. Editors should thus determine on a case-by-case basis whether the opinions published there are independent and also if they constitute due weight. Usage of these sources for third-party claims in biographies of living persons as well as medical or scientific claims is not allowed.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-latin/jennifer-lopez-will-speak-kamala-harris-rally-las-vegas-1235146542/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support