• Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yeah they’re hoping for an invasion of Taiwan, they talk a fair bit in the article about the difficulty of naval invasions. Which is like, fair enough, but a hundred miles gap puts Taiwan and any US troops there in range of thousands of Chinese missiles. One imagines that an invasion gets a lot easier after sinking a US carrier group or two.

    That said, I don’t see China going for it. Both countries are pretty okay with the status quo or maybe reunification in the coming decades, but very few people want war.

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      I expect that reunification will only become more likely when the US appropriates the TSMC foundry in Arizona and leaves Taipei to rot.

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        With modern missile tech is there even any reason to put nuclear missiles in Taiwan? I was under the impression that ICBMs have basically made that pointless. Oh no, the targets will live for 5-10 whole minutes longer during the travel time.

        • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          It kinda matters in that there’s a chain of command before you can retaliate. Someone has to see the missiles, make sure it’s not a malfunction, tell their boss who tells their boss, etc. Ideally your missiles land before the counterattack starts. This is why deploying missiles in eastern Europe was such a big deal to Putin as well.