• Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I watched Last Action Hero a few years ago for the first time, and it honestly didn’t even feel that dated. It held up!

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      I think Last Action Hero is an overall good movie with some flaws.

      It takes a little too long to get going, the bit at the front that mostly establishes that his life is kind of dull and he prefers to go to the movies drags a bit. They play the “BECAUSE THIS IS A MOVIE” note a little too often and Slater just outright doesn’t believe him for a little too long, he should have started to buy it before they go out into the real world. And the ending kind of just putters out? The bits where it’s a send-up of action flicks is really fun and it’s worth seeing for that, though I think True Lies is a better loving send-up of action flicks.

  • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah… I don’t care. I watch a movie and accept it for what it is. If I’m entertained for a few hours, great. If not, meh. I don’t need critical opinion.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I agree. I usually do it out of curiosity though. I tend to find, in general, the reviews are on par though.

      The number of times I watch something and afterwards am like “that felt kind of shit”, turns out everyone else agrees and I’m wondering why I didn’t check first to save my time.

    • hellodcooper@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      ‘Most’ People on the internet want to ascribe to a hivemind. Basically what the OP is suggesting with this thought exercise regarding films we have watched. It’s very sad, people need to watch a film, make a decision and stop flip flopping cause their group says something else about film.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The butterfly effect.

    I saw it when I was rather young but I thought it was pretty good, apparently people thought it’s edgy.

    Should watch it again now and see if it holds up.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      43 minutes ago

      I saw a version with a different ending (cuz piracy) than that what was widely released in theaters and i really liked it. Have you seen both? Do you know what I’m talking about?

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          I’ve heard in the theatrical version he goes back and ends his friendship right? In the version i saw

          seriously cw warning i warned you

          He goes back in to the womb using a sonogram and wraps the umbilical cord around his neck killing himself so he instead never meets her


    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I saw it when I was rather young but I thought it was pretty good, apparently people thought it’s edgy.

      That’s me, I’m people. Same as you, I remember watching it when I was young and thinking it was a cool mature thriller, but I rewatched it last year for the first time and I was honestly a little shocked at how edgy it seems. Like the first 30 minutes really hammer how much trauma Evan went through, and it just felt really heavy handed.

      edit: to be clear I don’t hate The Butterfly Effect, I just remember distinctly thinking how edgy it was on review

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Observe And Report starring Seth Rogan.

    It’s a movie about a mall security guard and it often gets confused for the awful Paul Blart movies by people, which is why I think it gets dismissed. But it’s genuinely darkly funny. It leans into the hero complex of the main character and it gets weird and off putting in the best kinds of ways. If you like Death To Smoochie, you will probably like it.

  • JillyB@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I showed my friends Rubber. It’s a movie about a serial killer tire. I think it’s great. Everyone I’ve showed it to thought it was terrible.

    • Plum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I did a deep dive into pre-2000’s Schwarzenegger movies recently and they’re basically all good.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        True Lies is truly great. There are a bunch of other good choices in there too, but true lies really sticks in my head.

  • ToasterOverlord@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Kangaroo Jack (2003) for me. It’s not objectively good but I found it silly and fun, and it’s one of my dad’s favorite movies. Never really understood why it’s so panned (9% critic and 29% audience on Rotten Tomatoes)

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    i feel like it’s much harder when you finish a movie, and you hate it, and then find out it’s one of the most critically acclaimed movies of all time.

    this was my experience watching taxi driver. to this day, i have not been able to find a single other person who disliked that movie as much as i did

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      That’s how I felt about Paranormal Activity. It was like I spent the entire movie waiting for something scary to happen. A thing just… stood there. Every “night” on screen felt the same: a being… just standing there. Not standing there sharpening a knife. Not standing there ominously stroking people’s cheeks. Nothing attacked or even made threats to do so. It just. fucking. stood. there.

      Then when something finally started to happen, the movie ended.

      I don’t know if my standards for “scary” are too high, but I found the entire film (save for those last few seconds) to be extremely boring. How it’s so popular (and even spawned a sequel?!) is beyond me.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Same, not for Taxi Driver, but for The Deer Hunter, Chinatown, Life is Beautiful, Amour…

    • JayObey711@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh my god I just watched taxi driver and thought it was mediocre at best. Gave it 2 1/2 stars. Saw that it sits at 4,2?!?

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I get this, other than Pulp Fiction, I dislike all of Tarantino’s films.

      I don’t like the style or the pacing, I don’t like the revisionist take on events.

      But people generally like his films.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Congo is one of my favorite movies of all time I can recite every line in it. It’s only got a 23% on RT and like a 5/10 on IMDb but I don’t care. I still love the fuck out of that movie

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The first Silent Hill movie and the Tim Burton Charlie and the Chocolate Factory stand out for me. The consensus seems to be that they suck, but I like 'em.

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was my jam as a little girl… but it might just be because I ended up being bisexual and there’s a lot of beautiful and badass people in it.

    • FrustratedArtist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      6-7 on IMDB is a pretty decent score, plenty of good movies in that range. If it’s 5 and below it means it’s right proper schlock.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s not how IMDb rating works. It’s just an aggregate based on the number of users voting on it. It’s basically useless at distinguishing a stinker from a watchable weeknight movie from a masterpiece. Rotten Tomatoes attempts to address this imbalance with a weighted scheme, which usually works better for well-known movies.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I read the book first which made me really not like the movie. I think in a vacuum the movie is fine, but the heavy fictionalization to the point of preposterousness of something that was only one part of the book was just such a twisting. The book was about government waste, fraud, and abuse. The movie was about a wacky special forces guy who could apparently on some level actually use powers.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Waterworld is fine. It just gets ragged on because of its insane budget and the lackluster results for said budget. But if you don’t care about that and just watch a movie, it’s a decent movie.

      The Simpsons joke where the tie in video game needs 40 quarters is still funny though.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Is that simply a reference to it going over budget? I never got that joke.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The movie was infamously over budget. It basically doubled from its initial budget and was for the time a record expensive movie to make. All of that for a final product that was fine but not really showing all that money on screen. It was the topic of many late night show jokes and such.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Like most, I totally disagree. However, it had such great potential.

      I feel the same about Valerian. The imagery was pure eye candy and then I watched it, so looking forward to a great flick, and what I got was… Valerian.

      • Et Al@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Valerian and Laureline should have been played by a young Bruce Campbell and Angelina Jolie. I will say that the two actual actors are good, but having them as those characters was the very definition of miscast.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The setting and design in Valerian is fantastic. The opening sequence really is among the best in film. Shame about the plot and main characters.