• zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you can’t even count, I don’t see a reason to listen to anything else you have to say on intelligent. There are two graphs in the paper you cited, the one that I’ve posted in another comment (figure 1) and a pie chart of prostitution regimes in appendix C. The former shows some places have the substitution effect overshadow the scale effect and it some places the opposite occurs. The latter is a pie chart that doesn’t have a dependent variable.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Technically none of them are labelled graph, so zero, but I was including the tables and appendices.

          • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not the label that makes something a graph. Including tables and charts that are data but do not show a relationship into the things that support your conclusions is incorrect. You claimed to have a preponderance of evidence where what you had was one incorrectly interpreted graph. Do you understand why I called you out on that?