• return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    27 days ago

    Kamala Harris truly is Hillary Clinton 2.0.

    Many of Harris’s mistakes were similar to those Hillary Clinton made in 2016. Like Clinton, Harris cozied up to billionaire donors. Mark Cuban, for instance, said he was delighted that Harris was abandoning Democrats’ commitments to progressive principles and letting the business community propose the policies it wanted. Like Clinton, Harris and Tim Walz made hubristic campaign stops in solidly red states like Texas and Kentucky rather than spending the final days laser-focused on crucial battlegrounds. Like Clinton, Harris emphasized celebrity endorsements while failing to successfully court unions. (Most notably, the Teamsters declined to endorse her after she refused to pledge that she wouldn’t break a national railway strike.) Like Clinton, Harris focused too much on the danger of Donald Trump (which is very real) and not enough on the reasons why she would be good at being president herself.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ll just say that all the policies she proposed seemed entirely uninteresting to me. Credits for first time home buyers and something about building new homes seemed like her main talking point. This is great for all the people that don’t currently own a home and want to but does nothing for most people that also need help.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        It benefits you by reducing homelessness and poverty in general which has a much higher cost for society in the long run. Holy fuck you guys are so self centered.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          27 days ago

          That was not her message. So get off your high horse. It was “I’m going to build houses and it’ll save money for some people that probably aren’t you”. Periodt

          But the exit polls showed that most people felt they were worse ofd today than 4 years ago. You expect all those people to read between the lines to figure out this will help make things better for them eventually? That’s not how politics works.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            Which saves you money in the long run, that’s what you can’t get into your head, helping others get out of the shit they’re in helps everyone and saves money for everyone in the long run.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              27 days ago

              It’s the job of the campaign to explicitly make this argument. They did not. They failed. It is not our fault for their failure. You making this argument is the first I’m even hearing this.

              • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                I get so frustrated at the poor messaging. Glen younkin stood on stage against mcauffee and straight up lied about crt in school, and no body called him out in it.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Blaming the campaign for your ignorance 👍 You have the right to continue educating yourself once you’re out of school.

                • danc4498@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  Lol, this has to be the most naive and hilarious bs I’ve seen in a while. Harris did nothing wrong. No notes. It’s 100% the people that are wrong. Keep living that fantasy while the rest of us try to autopsy this corpse of a campaign and see what the cause of death is.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          Holy fuck you guys are so self centered.

          You’re awfully preachy defending a campaign message that was such an abject failure.

        • rishado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Do you really expect everyone to vote in the name of altruism? How naive can you be?

    • aquafunkalisticbootywhap@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      26 days ago

      after she refused to pledge that she wouldn’t break a national railway strike

      JUST LIE my god youll already be in office and can make up some nonsense why you had to break the strike (Im not antiunion, Im just saying)

      JUST FUCKING LIE or were all the existential threats you wouldnt shut the fuck up about (instead of actually having a platform) not worth doing whatever you needed to get into power!?

      sigh

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      27 days ago

      You’re right that she was Hilary 2.0, but for the wrong reason.

      It has very little to do with policy.

      The difference between winning and losing was almost certainly just people who preferred a man over a woman as president. Whether they will say it or not, America is still not ready for a female president.

      “In 2020, men were almost evenly divided between Trump and Biden, unlike in 2016 when Trump won men by 11 points.”

      This election, Trump won men by 10 points again.

      Democrats have got the largest share of women’s votes in every election since 1988.

      Losing 10 points of the male vote isn’t caused by support for Israel, or a lack of progressive policies.

      This is the sad truth.

      • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s the economy. They can scream the economy numbers are great but the people are feeling it differently at the grocery store, gas station, paying rent, etc.

          • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            27 days ago

            “It’s broken because of Biden and she should have fixed it during the last four years.” It’s stupid logic but that’s what it came down to for some.

            • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              27 days ago

              Women didn’t buy that logic, but men did?

              Harris won essentially the same percentage of women as Biden did, but lost entirely on the fact that fewer men voted for her (by a wide margin)

              I’m pretty sure the simple explanation is right here, and it had nothing to do with the economy.

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                24 days ago

                but lost entirely on the fact that fewer men voted for her (by a wide margin)

                it had nothing to do with the economy.

                Thats not true at all-- its just what you wish was true.
                She lost in every single demographic besides white college educated women. She especially lost amongst the poor voters. She lost amongst nonwhite women and not college educated women.

                Gender and race certainly had a part in it, but the facts dont match your conclusions. Lies dont become anyone – even someone dealing with a hard loss.

                We have enough lies to sort through already and your adding to the pile will not help matters. How about we make some effort to get to “the truth” not “your truth”.

                • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  I’m not talking about who lost vs won each demographic, I’m referring to changes to percentages which you don’t seem to understand.

                  Harris lost more male votes than female, far more. It simply doesn’t make sense that she would lose such a massive difference in men if the economy was the primary reason. Men don’t care about the economy significantly more than women do, it’s an issue that both genders put at the top of their priorities.

                  It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that Harris being female cost her at least some votes, and she didn’t lose by very much. Only 3 people changed sides this election out of every 100 voters(net of course), that’s it. It’s not hard to think that may be due to her gender or race.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I’m not going deny that there were certainly sexist people that wouldn’t vote for a woman. But I don’t think I can agree it was the difference between winning and losing.

        I think it’s much, much more likely that the progressive voting bloc that was able to start winning the primaries in 2020 and was railroaded by the party (twice) that’s been completely shunted off to the side in favor of some mythical swing Republican voter is very much the reason.

        They think putting a woman of color up as the candidate would be enough to win that bloc. Which goes to show the root of the problem. It’s the rainbow capitalist issue. “If we slap a pride flag on the person of color we got as our new representative and change our single bathroom signs to say ‘all gender,’ we’ll be in the right! We’ll fool those hippies and socialist dirtbags yet!”

        This has failed them. Over and over. The most thinking people of the entire country (biased opinion, I grant) aren’t easily appeased. Things were so bad in 2020 that bloc mostly held their noses to vote for Biden. And they figured running against trump was the only ammunition they needed to lock down that bloc and they could hold them no problem while also courting the neocons!

        They are funding a genocide. Basically perpetrating it. They were going to have to bend over backwards to get anyone left of Biden to vote for them. And they unquestionably didn’t. They basically told us to go fuck ourselves. Again.

        And they fucked themselves by doing so.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          27 days ago

          Your reasoning doesn’t explain the male vs female vote difference. Kamala won essentially the same percentage of the female vote as Biden, but lost because she didn’t capture male voters. Why would only male voters abandon her based on the policies you mentioned?

  • That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Democrats are not leftists, they’re center right. I’m so sick of people thinking Democrats are going to fix this, protect that, and make things better. Democrats serve their corporate masters, and they’ll make vague promises that they know they won’t keep.

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    27 days ago

    I really don’t care, do you?

    If people didn’t vote for Harris it just means they are happy with fascists.

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      I care because I’m not happy with fascists, and yet, due to others’ apathy, ignorance, malice, or a mix thereof I have to live in a land ruled by fascists.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      Yeah at this moment I am not ready for recriminations and finger pointing. A bunch of people voted FOR that idiot criminal fascist and I’m reserving all my rage for them right now.

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        No man, those guys will always vote R no matter what. The problem is the Dems not showing up because the candidate is a woman.

      • aquafunkalisticbootywhap@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        great, lmk when that rage does literally anything productive

        they already know youre mad at them. fun fact: it makes some of them even happier to vote the way they did. but, sure, be angry! oh those damn, foolish, selfish people! …

        ok, yes, welcome to the last 40 years. hi!

        now what?

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          Hey, I’m beyond doing anything productive at the moment and I recognize this. So how about you take a break from sniping at people who are probably on the same side as you are and let them take the time they need to process this so they can get to a place where they can chart a course of action?

    • _bcron_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Pretty much this, by now pretty much everyone knows Trump and knows what he wants and what he stands for, and we had a referendum of sorts. If that alone isn’t enough motivation for someone to go to the polls or request a ballot it’s pretty disingenious for people to point fingers at the DNC or Harris because they weren’t jazzed up enough.

      Like, if someone isn’t willing to stand in line for a couple hours in an attempt to ensure that their great-great-grandchildren have a habitable world in which to exist we’re a pretty hopeless species, right?

    • VubDapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      That’s one interpretation of what it could mean but one I expect is overly simplistic.

      There is a difference between being happy with fascism and not feeling motivated enough to resist it. If the tide has any chance of turning towards what would be more healthy it will have to come by creating a platform that really excites and motivates a large number of people to invest in it. It has to feel authentic to those who are feeling unmotivated today eg the millions of former Biden voters who did not turn out. It should activate people who are not reliable voters to genuinely support the cause.

      I’m no leftist but I do agree that Democrats and others whose main goals are to leave unchallenged the status quo of growing wealth inequality cannot win going forward. The promise of a truly experienced greater tangible quality of life, enough food, affordable housing, access to affordable medical care, debt relief, high minimum wages and/or UBI, etc would move the needle better towards excitement and engagement than abstractions like defence of democracy. “A chicken in every pot”. We need another FDR. We need a strong middle class and that has to mean powerful unions.

      Edited for paragraphs.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        27 days ago

        Dems definitely lack a coherent, interesting economic message. Any new proposal - medicare for all, UBI - immediately gets sucked into a quagmire of details. Turning to Republicans for the votes they need to win in general elections has been such a consistently losing strategy that I have no idea why they keep doing it.

        Meanwhile Republicans keep running on “You feel poor and it’s Their fault,” continues to resonate, for varying definitions of “Them,” as long as GOP is out-of-power. It’s simple. It feels good. It completely absolves them of needing any policy more complicated than “Get rid of Them.” It’s a winning strategy as much as the Dems have a losing strategy.

      • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Dude those are promises completely devoid of validity or meaning.

        “Vote for me and I’ll fix everything”.

        Trump says it: “great!! Let’s vote him”

        Any democrat says it: “but how? Have you considered the plight of the fruitfly??? I cannot vote for you unless you explain everything in every detail”

        I forgot that trump just needs “concepts of a plan”

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      88% of the dems didnt agree with assisting in the Israeli war crimes. And yet Biden/Harris (and trump) were going to do it anyway. But you want to preach about people who didnt vote for harris embracing fascism…

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This is what happens when anyone that warns someone is sick gets burnt at the stake as a witch.

    When your own party is criticizing the candidate, you need to realize that 17 million more aren’t going to put the effort into complaining, they’re not going to hold their nose and vote.

    They’re just gonna stay home.

    So when the politically active tries to warn the party, it would behoove the party to listen to it’s base.