Tech tycoon Elon Musk joined a call between US President-elect Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky the day after the presidential election, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There will be no agreements.

    trump is going to change US policy to excluding all intelligence and military support and will “leak” all known military intel to putin.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        Don’t worry. He was just confused last time and totally will never steal and leak sensitive information ever again because that would be against the law. Just like he won’t extend his presidency or rig an election because that would violate the constitution.

        We’ve been seeing this shit for months. At first I thought it was just contrarian dumbasses. But I have increasingly realized that this is people convincing themselves that it was fine to vote for trump. Oh, he wasn’t REALLY going to do anything to violate teh constitution when he led an armed insurrection against the capital and was just buying time for rudy g to solve things. Oh, he isn’t going to serve the country to putin because all those heroic men and women in uniform will stop him this time for real.

        It is fucking idiocy.

        • WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          7 days ago

          As a 4th generation veteran, it makes so angry to think how many people died in the name of democracy and suddenly half the population is choosing for someone intending to end it to run the show.

          We’re in for some dark times ahead.

          • 800XL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 days ago

            And a lot of those people are the children of parents that fought/died in WW2 against the Nazis, and had family or children even that fought/died against dictators like the one they fucking elected!

            Not only that, but they tried to overthrow the government their family died defending for this charlatan. It’s so pathetic my brain goes in loops trying to understand the absolute madness of it.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      And all those 5* Generals and going to stand by and salute ?

      You really don’t understand America .

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        Someone in another thread said that Trump could fire generals until he gets someone who is willing to use troops domestically.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          He honestly wouldn’t need to.

          In a past life I worked with a LOT of senior military folk for the purpose of grants and funding and the like. And basically anyone (guesstimating) above the rank of a Captain equivalent (outside of SF) is basically a lifer. And they very rapidly learn how political the upper echelons are and that they need to stay as neutral as possible to get further promotions and have good assignments.

          I could very much see various Lieutenants and even some Captains complain about leaving the Ukrainians to die. They will then be immediately told by the nearest Major or General that they are a disgrace to the uniform for refusing orders and blah blah blah. And that will propagate down the line so that the NCO who is ACTUALLY valued for their initiative understands that they will be brought up on treason if they violate these orders.

          Because those Generals? They build their entire lives around always being able to say “I was just following orders”. They KNOW when you get things in writing.

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s not even worth comment. Was it LemmyUnder11 or something ?

          A president can’t a fire a general. He cannot fire a dozen generals an retain control of the military.

          • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            The president can’t? Let’s see of the Supreme Court has anything to say about that. Right now, I’m not confident the word can’t is in their dictionary as far as a president is concerned.

            • zante@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Theres an unfortunate autocorrect there that confuses my point :

              The president CAN fire a general, but he cannot fire 12 generals . That’s the point I want to make.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 days ago

              Since Trump technically can’t commit crimes as a president, nothing is stopping him from killing the generals until they comply.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You’re right.

        Just like none of us understood when they all sat with their thumbs up their asses waiting to see how January 6 would shake out. But hey, that is fine. It was because they were waiting for orders from the POTUS or the VPOTUS… that the VPOTUS had a lynch mob and compromised secret service agents hunting down.

        But hey, I want me some salmon so Support The Troops God Bless America We Are Number One Make America Great Again, right?

        • zante@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Honestly mate I’m I don’t mean to rude, but you haven’t got a clue, have you ?

          the Military industrial complex is making bank. The military is fighting Russia on the cheap, without a single soldier lost, and its strangling the Russian economy.

          You think anyone is going to interrupt that ? Be allowed to interrupt that ?

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Ah. So they are going to fight to save the economy, not the country.

            That is at least somewhat believable. Except… it isn’t like we are going to pay them less. And that still involves military officers revolting unless we live in a world where you think Lockheed Martin have secret kill switches in… I don’t even know what. The cell phone trump uses to talk to putin?