• r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I looked at that. Actually I would argue that was even more negligence by the management there. I mean they couldn’t even say how long he’d not been working for.

    But in reality he was paid for at least 6 years of work (and they suspected more) and only fined for 1 year of pay. So, he’s still a winner I think. And yes, public funds likely did help in bringing that case forward.

    Most larger private businesses tend to avoid going to a court for such things unless they need to in my experience.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean it’s kinda embarrassing for the company to pay people to do nothing. It makes them seem a bit incompetent. I worked in a military branch where the three biggest fish of the branch got fired (maybe sued) because they hardly did anything. They would go to work, and then go on hunting trips together or shit like that. They did that for years, but they didn’t really know how long. So now people obviously began to wonder what else they are doing with their money, and why no one realised that there were 3 people making an absurd amount of money for a job that is already super chill and overpaid, that didn’t even do the work of one competent employee. I remember they had trouble finding replacements, so no one did their job until i left like a year or two later.