• GlenRambo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I recently looked into them. They seem shit. Dodgey outdated apps to make them work and such.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s another reason why they’re kinda dead now. Closeted apps they have to maintain just to keep that garden walled, and it was a cost they decided they also didn’t want to spend.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I tried them with a few different cameras. They sucked. They wouldn’t reliably connect to Wi-Fi, and they didn’t reliably upload images.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Too bad it should be the simplest way to add wifi file transfer to a 3d printer

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        If you’re interested and can get your hands on some kind of SBC (like a raspberry pi) Klipper has been amazing for my printer. You can also use pretty much any computer but it’ll be much less efficient energy wise.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I’d rather just have an ethernet port on the damn printer. You shouldn’t have to cludge together basic network device functionality on devices that expensive

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          At least my 3d printer was so inexpensive it’s silly.

          I’m pretty happy that the engineering team that built it doesn’t need to worry about networking code and maintaining a networked device. Jappy that an open source community does it instead.