Linked above is his “Duty To Warn” letter he claims to have sent to the White House sounding the alarm that the 2024 election was stolen. Since this letter, he has heard nothing from the Harris team. This silence prompted him to write another substack post entitled: If you see Something, say Something? Wherein he bellows about the lack of action from the Harris team. He paints himself as a hardened veteran of the field, and even as someone who apparently catches election hacking on the regular. He remains baffled by the idea that the status quo must be maintained, even in the face of the total collapse of “US Democracy”.

/r/somethingiswrong2024 has taken him as their prophet, and now hang on his every word. Posts about getting him NEW informaiton, posts about his interviews, it goes on and on.

Spoonamore was apparently on The Thom Heartman Program, which was apparently a bid deal for people following this “recount” effort. He seems to have coined this term, that sits at the center of his theory, called “Bullet Ballots”. I attempted to do a little searching on “Bullet Ballots” and the only results I get are people talking about Spoonamore. According to Spoonamore, a “Bullet Ballot” is one where no down ballot options are selected. It is strictly a selection for the president, and somehow he knows (based on data) that Donald Trump had an “above average” amount of “bullet ballots” to the tune of 600,000 ballots. This, he claims, is what stole the election.

It isn’t just isolated to Reddit. People on Threads, Twitter, Tiktok, and even Hacker News, are discussing Spoonamore and his “Bullet Ballot” theory. With only two substack posts and almost no other history, somehow this Spoonamore guy cracked the whole case on Trump election fraud, but no one of significance cares to listen.

  • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I think we have to remember that spoonamore is not (nor is he claiming to be) an election expert or a statistician. His math does seem wrong, but his real expertise is in hacking. So the things he says in his letter about how a hack could have potentially worked is more important than the math. This may not be the real story, and it’s very important to fact check, but his expertise in addition to the other letter from security experts the other day both can give insight into the vulnerabilities with the voting machines. All of this is important.

    sicko-yes

    This is how you know this is different than 2020.

    We have graphs and data.

    They had feelings.

    Lmao BLUEANON RISE UP