• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    4 days ago

    Anyone who does not understand the sunk cost fallacy should not be in management.

    You’ve spent $x on office space. You can:

    A. Use it, and make your employees hate working for you or

    B. Let it go unused, and your employees are happier to continue working for you.

    The money is spent either way. The only difference is morale, which does in fact directly contribute to your bottom line.

      • Sabin10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        4 days ago

        When you are locked in to a 3/5/10 year lease for the space, that’s not actually an option. Most leases signed pre covid should be up by now but clueless management probably renewed anyways.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          And the really big corporations own their buildings. You think the company locked into leases are mad? The companies who own the building are pissed! Some have a multi million dollar building that’s losing value faster than the speed of light.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            What big company owns their building. Most I k ow build it then sell it to a management company then lease the space back. There is some accounting reason for this.

              • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Nihilism is cool and all, but smart thoughtful people are working really hard on this and it’s not easy - unless you create windowless tenements with no plumbing.

                • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  First part of finding a solution is admitting to the problem. For the change we need, the wealthy and powerful need to be removed.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      IMO, it’s worse than that. It’s not like creating a digital product, paying for a Super Bowl ad, etc. Those desks, phones, computers all still exist and can be sold. Not to mention the real estate! The slightest bit of foresight and planning and these companies could easily offset any costs they’re paying, but no; they only focus on the current fiscal quarter…

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Step 1: Hire staff

        Step 2: Train staff to do job

        Step 3: COVID! Oh no! Everyone work from home.

        Step 4: ???

        Step 5: Fire staff to save money.

        Step 6: Profit.

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s nice to find the rant in your head written out. A previous employer of mine dropped two properties in favor of a store front.

    • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      They can’t depreciate the assets and use them as a deduction if it doesn’t count as an office expense. That only qualifies if a threshhold minimum number of workers spend a threshhold minimum amount of time in the office.