ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 2 days agoDifferent rules for theeslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down128
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1external-linkDifferent rules for theeslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squarehorse_battery_staple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·2 days agoThis time sure. But it was the first time since Reagan.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 days agoNah, Bush did it during his re-election in 2004.
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·2 days agoThanks again, stay-at-homers! You’re heroes!
minus-squareRefurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down6·2 days agoVoter shaming is a great way to make those people continue to not vote in the future. A lot of people require something to vote for and not just something to vote against.
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·23 hours agoIt’s actually non-voter shaming. And the something to vote for is better than this. It was simple and obvious from day 1. They fucked it up, intentionally, to the detriment of everyone. They ought to be ashamed.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoBush won the popular vote in '04 (because of 9/11, of course).
This time sure. But it was the first time since Reagan.
Nah, Bush did it during his re-election in 2004.
Thanks again, stay-at-homers! You’re heroes!
Voter shaming is a great way to make those people continue to not vote in the future.
A lot of people require something to vote for and not just something to vote against.
It’s actually non-voter shaming.
And the something to vote for is better than this. It was simple and obvious from day 1. They fucked it up, intentionally, to the detriment of everyone. They ought to be ashamed.
Bush won the popular vote in '04 (because of 9/11, of course).