r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    20 years is a good cutoff, in my opinion. That puts the original God of War in retro territory, and I’m ok with that. I’m also ok with vanilla WoW (up to patch 1.8 or so) being retro. These things are old, we’re getting old and pretending games from 2005 and before aren’t retro is just wishful thinking.

  • iagomago@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    To me, “retro” just means something that is now only possible for consumption through the previous, now impossible or highly impractical, acquisition of said medium. PS3? Retro. 3DS? Retro.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This seems like a good line to draw. Does it play natively on current consoles? Not retro. If you have to use an emulator or pull out an older console then that’s retro.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If it can be emulated on a potato it’s retro. If it’s it’s old but not trivial to emulate then it’s classic.

  • ahornsirup@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    /r/retrogaming’s definition doesn’t work anymore now that there are multiple generations that grew up with video games. Just because it doesn’t feel retro to the 40 year old who remembers playing the PS2 as a teenager doesn’t mean it’s not retro. The PS2 is absolutely a retro console, and the PS3 is very much getting there.

    • Kelly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      10 years seems a bit short, that would mean Hearthstone, GTA5 and Sims 4 qualify.

      • Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes that’s what I said. PS3 era games and at this point, early PS4 start yo qualify for me. Although still actively developed games aren’t “fully” retro, clearly. I’m still on the fence about calling Bloodbkrne retro, for instance.

  • AllNewTypeFace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It goes on vibes. Historically I’d have said anything with an 8- or 16-bit CPU (NES/SNES, Megadrive, the surfeit of home computers before everyone standardised on beige-box Windows PCs). Nowadays I’d say anything slow enough to be emulated reasonably using present-day technology could be said to be retro, so PS2 would count. If video output is analogue PAL/NTSC, that probably also counts.

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Back in the PS2/Xbox/Gamecube era the SNES and Megadrive seemed to be retro while the PS1 and N64 were just “old”. So maybe 2 generations ago is the start of retro.

    I think it’s definitely a lot blurrier now though. The differences between consoles and the leaps between generations are less pronounced, and there are so many y rereleases and remasters now keeping older games fresh.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Anything before the GameCube, PS2, and Original Xbox.

    So PS1, Sega Saturn, and Nintendo64 and older are “retro.”

    The Atari 2600 and Colecovision are “vintage.”

    Pong and the Magnavox Odyssey are “antique.”

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Original Xbox, GameCube, PS2, Dreamcast - “old.”

        PS3, Xbox 360, Wii - “modern.”

        PS4, Xbox One - “previous gen”

        PS5, Xbox Series - “current gen”

        Nintendo Switch - “2015 smartphone”

        • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          But the PS3 / 360 are coming up to 20 years old. Hell, one of my adult colleagues was born after the 360 was released. Can they really be considered modern anymore?

          • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            “Modernism” is a term used to refer to art and culture from 1930s-1940s America. Searching for something like furniture or architecture in that style would mean you use search terms like “modern furniture” or “modern architecture.” Can that really be considered “modern” anymore?

            When the PS4 and Xbox One are no longer the “previous gen” I will be calling them “next gen,” as that is the term most associated with those consoles. Even after the consoles were released and well into their lifespan they were still called “next gen.”

            I call future consoles that haven’t released yet “upcoming gen” or “future gen” interchangeably.

    • duffer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Anything that came out when I was a kid or earlier is retro so anything pre 1990 is retro. Post is modern.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anything that would make a kid today instantly say “ew, that old thing?” is retro to me. That includes everything up through PS2/Gamecube/Xbox to me.