pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 day agonuked from orbitmander.xyzimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1396arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1385arrow-down1imagenuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·20 hours agohaha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-219 hours agoIt’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-218 hours agoIt’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoSure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
Sure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.