Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago
    • permanent revolution;
    • that parties should be democratic institutions;
    • that burocratization leads to deformed proletarian states.
    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Are you saying you disagree with Trots on these matters, or that you agree with Trots despite their unique positions among Marxists in general?

      I don’t think anyone would disagree with you regarding parties needing to be democratic, so I assume you are referring to a specific type of democracy.

      As for Permanent Revolution, I think that was kind of “debunked” when the peasantry showed itself to be a genuine ally of the proletariat. Abandoning building Socialism because a revolution in Germany never appeared and instead focusing your efforts on exporting revolution ultimately would have led to a lack of developed industry, and a loss in World War II for the Soviets. Communism still requires global revolution, but it makes more sense to build up Socialism domestically and use that to fuel revolution globally than it does to focus almost entirely on the idea of a global revolution.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        i think that in most communist movements around the world, we fourthists are minority. hence i tend to disagree on some points with the majority (mostly m-l’s). but we mostly agree on marx’s method for analyzing society and economy.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Gotcha, I don’t agree with you but your comment makes sense if you are comparing yourself to the broader Marxist movement, and not just within your tendency.