Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldM to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMarc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerouswww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1377arrow-down112
arrow-up1365arrow-down1external-linkMarc Rober shows why Tesla's camera-only self-driving system is dangerouswww.youtube.comGhostalmedia@lemmy.worldM to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 day agoNot any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
minus-squaretoolverine@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoHuman drivers generally use sound as well.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoFortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
minus-squareRickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 hours agoFSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job. And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours ago FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job. But…it’s not.
minus-squareRickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoBased on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos? It’s not there yet but I don’t see how it can’t work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 hours ago Based on? The fact that both systems are vision only, as I said previously. Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos? Even better, I used it myself. For 3 months. It’s awful.
minus-squaresir_pronoun@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 hours agoBut do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better? Just playing devil’s advocate here.
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 hours agoThe software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoYes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.
Not any tangible difference in this scenario. Both use vision only. And both use the same computers.
Human drivers use vision only
Human drivers generally use sound as well.
Fortunately humans have much better hardware and software to accompany that vision.
FSD hard and software has just to be good enough for the job.
And still we cause so many deaths because we are tired, distracted or emotional when driving.
But…it’s not.
Based on? Have you seen the progress in users YouTube videos?
It’s not there yet but I don’t see how it can’t work with vision only. It just has to be safer than human drivers.
The fact that both systems are vision only, as I said previously.
Even better, I used it myself. For 3 months. It’s awful.
But do they use a different software? Maybe FSD is more advanced than autopilot and could have reacted better?
Just playing devil’s advocate here.
The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.
Yes, completely different software, but both are limited by machine vision.