The visitors are encouraged to drive? You sure about that? I mean in most bigger European cities tourists will use public transport. Its not at all convenient to rent a car just for driving within city limits.
Also, you talk about the cost of the ticketing system as if they had to remake it from scratch, they just need to maintain the current one.
The visitors are encouraged to drive? You sure about that? I mean in most bigger European cities tourists will use public transport. Its not at all convenient to rent a car just for driving within city limits.
If you’re not incentivizing them to take transit, you’re encouraging them to drive.
Also, you talk about the cost of the ticketing system as if they had to remake it from scratch, they just need to maintain the current one.
Which is not an insignificant expense. Fair gates need to be maintained, residential status verified, etc.
If you’re not incentivizing them to take transit, you’re encouraging them to drive.
Ok, I don’t think you have ever been to big European cities, this is not how people have their priorities cut out when visiting. But I can see that discussing this further leads nowhere, since you don’t believe me and I don’t believe you.
Thanks for your civility. My whole premise is predicated on questions neither of us can answer. You’re quite right that I’ve never been to Europe (only England and Wales as an infant), but I feel my studies of urbanism and transit provide some insight. Thanks for the pleasant chat.
Honestly, the only tourists that will really use a car are from «close» cities such Marseille or Toulouse. And they will choose the car because the Intercités train service is garbage, which has nothing to do with Montpellier’s public transports.
I am not sure tourists in Montpellier are such a rarity.
Estimated population is about 480 000.
I could not find great sources for how much tourism they get, but this page gives a number for conference attendants like 10 years ago and that was 1 200 000 per year (https://www.invest-in-montpellier.com/en/tourism-strategic-sector-montpellier-metropole)
Of course they don’t stay all year but these are all people not paying their taxes there and it makes sense to still ticket them.
It doesn’t make sense if the ticketing revenue is less than the expense of administering a ticketing system, plus issuing passes to all residents.
That’s before you consider those visitors are being encouraged to drive instead of taking transit which costs the taxpayers more!
The visitors are encouraged to drive? You sure about that? I mean in most bigger European cities tourists will use public transport. Its not at all convenient to rent a car just for driving within city limits.
Also, you talk about the cost of the ticketing system as if they had to remake it from scratch, they just need to maintain the current one.
If you’re not incentivizing them to take transit, you’re encouraging them to drive.
Which is not an insignificant expense. Fair gates need to be maintained, residential status verified, etc.
Ok, I don’t think you have ever been to big European cities, this is not how people have their priorities cut out when visiting. But I can see that discussing this further leads nowhere, since you don’t believe me and I don’t believe you.
Thanks for your civility. My whole premise is predicated on questions neither of us can answer. You’re quite right that I’ve never been to Europe (only England and Wales as an infant), but I feel my studies of urbanism and transit provide some insight. Thanks for the pleasant chat.
Honestly, the only tourists that will really use a car are from «close» cities such Marseille or Toulouse. And they will choose the car because the Intercités train service is garbage, which has nothing to do with Montpellier’s public transports.
It would be easier to make public transport free and add more to the tourist taxes paid by hotels